User talk:Imran4274

Notability of Scoopler
A tag has been placed on Scoopler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PirateSmackK Arrrr! 15:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, do you have any sources that mention the importance or notability of your product? Google archives came up empty. - Dank (push to talk) 16:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes I have,, here are the google results for scoopler -imran
 * Okay, it would be a good idea to pick out the 2 references from the most solid sources and add them to the article; the online version of printed newspapers, journals, magazines and books, old-fashioned as they are, are best for keeping your article from getting deleted. If anyone tags your article for deletion, let me know; my sense is that if we can just buy about 2 weeks of time, the sources will grow and it's won't be a problem. - Dank (push to talk) 18:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure enough, it was nominated for deletion again; I have applied WP:PROD, which gives you up to 7 days to find references. Remove the prod tag when the references are in place and you're satisfied with the article. - Dank (push to talk) 23:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Scoopler for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scoopler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scoopler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dan arndt (talk) 03:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)