User talk:Imranb35

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Unspecified source for Image:Navy01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Navy01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Iaf vampire wreckage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Iaf vampire wreckage.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:1965-war-pakistan33.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1965-war-pakistan33.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmir article is about the area administered by India, not the entire Kashmir region. For that, see Kashmir. -- Gman 124 talk 15:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Warning You appear to be editing articles which are then reverted, with an Edit summary stating vandalism, or having a Non Neutral point of view (also a form of vandalism). You then revert these edits back to your preferred edit format. If you keep doing these sort of edits an administrator will probably block your ability to edit any pages in wikipedia. If you feel your edits are justified It may be better to place a message on the articles talk page an say why you believe it to be so. Richard Harvey (talk) 10:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Final Warning Once again you have revert blatant vandalism to the Jammu and Kashmir article. your next edit of that type will result in your IP address being reported as a vandalism only account and probably blocked indefinately. Richard Harvey (talk) 16:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

First of all I would like to ask you that please first read some history of Kashmir from some independent sources like

http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006/09/08/india14159.htm

http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/kashmir/

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ASIANOW/south/09/07/india.kashmir.01/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/south_asia/02/voices_from_kashmir/html/waiter.stm

And I am sure very much that you believe in truth and if telling truth is vandalism then I am really sorry and I won’t edit any thing from now on. Imranb35 03:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The first message I placed was a polite message to let you know the edits you were doing were considered vandalism by editors and being reverted. Note I was not one of those editors!. The second message was a warning of blatant vandalism in relation to your reversion of blatant editing by another editor; IE:- this edit diff and nothing else. Which has nothing whatsoever to do with the various referenced media articles you have placed above. If you personally feel that vandalism is okay then that is unfortunate. Only you can decide if or not you wish to contribute constructive edits on this project. Note the messages above give you an idea as to how other editors view your contributions! Richard Harvey (talk) 10:14, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Kashmir voilence
A tag has been placed on Kashmir voilence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Kfc 18645  talk  02:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)