User talk:ImthatIm

Speedy deletion nomination of The One Peoples Public Trust
Hello ImthatIm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The One Peoples Public Trust for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, FrankDev (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
FrankDev (talk) 21:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The One Peoples Public Trust for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The One Peoples Public Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The One Peoples Public Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. InShaneee (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your actions as a tendentious agenda editor not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)