User talk:Imzaid

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Zaid Shakir has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Northumbrian (talk) 02:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Zaid Shakir constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Northumbrian (talk) 02:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Concerning the current revision as of 07:07, 27 May 2010 (edit) (undo) Jac16888 (talk | contribs) m (→Talkback: new section), you need to read the entire Discussion page for the month of May 2010. Secondly, a devious unknown User has been removing posts to this page (External links - websites, articles, and videos) as well. I have posted everything mentioned above on Zaid Shakir AS IT SHOULD BE. As for the "New York Times" article footnote no. 8, I also posted the CORRECT URL link. It seems this User is bent on posting the quote from this article, but has ill will intentions overall and had plagiarized it which is illegal. Since Monteil Monteil talk page has been deleted, I will continue to use the Imzaid talk page instead. As I had stated in my last comment on the Discussion page, after 2 years without any issues, this back and forth fiasco started April 30, 2010. And, I prefer to converse with Wikipedia's legal team. Imzaid (talk)10:22, 9 June, 2010 (UTC)

Jac 16888 Talk 07:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. When you recently edited Zaid Shakir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chronicle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zaid Shakir, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Berkeley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Imam's photo.jpg


The file File:Imam's photo.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Dear Tech Support, The disambiguation page link has been corrected as.

Thank you, Saliha Shakir

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zaid Shakir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MANA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Dear Tech Support,

As the admin for Zaid Shakir's page, I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for any edits posted. In regards to the Info box template, his status should not be listed as  Senior Posting and should be Muslim Leader instead.

How do I edit the status? Your prompt attention would be great appreciated.

Thank you, Saliha Shakir

In regards to MANA at https://mana-net.org/, it is a non-profit organization. I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for any edits posted, or my administrator as well.

Thank you, Imzaid (talk) 06:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC) Zaid Shakir

Imzaid (talk) 06:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello Imzaid. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Imzaid. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Muslim Apologists


A tag has been placed on Category:Muslim Apologists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Muslim Reformers


A tag has been placed on Category:Muslim Reformers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Muslim Theologians


A tag has been placed on Category:Muslim Theologians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)