User talk:In2can1

Welcome
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gcms Notes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gcms Notes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gcms_Notes Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Gcms_Notes reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC) --Template:Afc decline--

-->

Note
Hi In2can1, I reverted your edit of Note becaue disambiguation pages should link only to existing information, and I couldn't find any mention of a 'note' in any of the articles that you linked. (And while we're on the subject, descriptions should be succinct, with only one 'blue link'; details are WP:DABDD). If you could add a description of the notes to an article (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada?), it could then go back on the DAB page. Thanks, Leschnei (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Users posting links to personal websites and business
The following user Ramsagarnew added a link to a personal website or business (https://globaltree.in/services/immigration/) and he has been told not to do so and the link was removed from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Immigration_to_Canada&diff=prev&oldid=967006161&diffmode=source

Similarly an anonymous user 124.123.162.140 added a link to a personal website or business (http://www.bestmigrationconsultant.com/latest-canada-express-entry-draws/) and the change was removed from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Express_Entry&diff=next&oldid=960733213&diffmode=source

What are the best practices when I encounter such situations where folks are posting links to personal websites; just make the change and tell them so or is there a way to escalate the matter? Thanks In2can1 (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You can revert or remove such links when you find them and cite a policy like LINKSPAM.
 * If you discern that a user is persisting in disruptive edits, you should warn them on their talk page.
 * After a 4th level warning, it would be appropriate it bring the behavior to the attention of administrators at, probably, WP:ANI or, if the edits are more clearly simply vandalism, at WP:AIV.
 * And good job at trying to replace the broken link with a working one, but - in this particular case - it might be better to have dropped the entry from External links rather than provide a too-generic link. External link sections are a magnet for linkspam and they are always optional. Replacing a dead link with a spam link is a common tactic.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)