User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Jan07

Community block for Supreme Cmdr
I left a note here regarding specificity on the ban, instead of "Derek Smart-related articles". - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Can you enforce the ban, given this? - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 22:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Teen Titans (TV series)
The current link in Teen Titans (TV series) to it's list of episode pages is hard to find. I'd like to put some easy to find link on the page, any ideas? - Peregrinefisher 01:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

EVP1
Yes, I know. It was a disclaimer rather than a condition. The image has no scientific value.

perfectblue 16:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * "The dictionary goes on to suggest that" - well worded. Thanks. Doczilla 17:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Semiprotect The Matrix
I was wondering if its worthwhile sprotecting The Matrix. Regards, -- Jeff3000 15:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)


 * In Soviet Russia the matrix semiprotects you! ---J.S (T/C) 16:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Request for Comment
As an editor of the article "Jhonen Vasquez", you are invited to a Request for Comment (as suggested by Admin Luna Santin). Please see: Talk:Jhonen Vasquez. -- Tenebrae 03:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The illusion/Chao9999: I'd like some help on some issues.
Hey man. I'm here because I'm unable to move the article "Majora" to "Majora's Mask", as that article is a redirect article. I'd like your advice on this issue. I need to make the current "Majora's Mask" article become what "Majora" is, while "Majora" becomes a disambig. page which lists the game, and the character. Because of this, I'd like your assistance on what to do. Thanks in advance. -Chao9999 06:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Uh, hey, can you get back to me on that? AIM would be a good thing, heh. -Chao9999 06:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Incivil comments
Dear InShaneee - I would like to report inappropriate behaviour of user Eupator. We have a long argument with him on page Paytakaran. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paytakaran He insulted me several times. I ask you to interfere and block the page in the edition of Grandmaster or me.

I also would like to report that we have discussion with him and TigrantheGreat on page Urartu. The page was protected from editing but the current version is not satisfying for me. I proposed Eupator and TigranTheGreat to ask mediation agreement. They have not done that. I am trying to resolve the disputes with them in good spirit but it seems to be not sucessful. I thought that Urartu page was blocked by Nishkid64 - I asked him about interference to this and also Paytakaran issue. But he is perhaps busy and not responded.--Dacy69 14:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Nishkid64 responded. I will not make further comments. People start accusing me - make please your own judgement who is wrong. Here is the list of pages where we conducted the dispute 1 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paytakaran 2 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nishkid64#please_protect_a_page_Paytakaran_from_the_insults 3 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dacy69 --Dacy69 05:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Jawbone Radio
You participated in the Jawbone Radio AfD a couple of weeks ago. It's now up for deletion review. Regards, Alphachimp 05:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Throwing accusations around
You jumped in and told me "Calm down. Wikipedia does not allow you to simply throw around accusations anywhere and for any reason you please, and you can only harm the site if you're going to jump into debates to 'save the day'. --InShaneee 03:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC) But this is exactly what happens when Tajik is accused of anything, others are required to support their accusations, but administrators allow unsupported accusations against those accusing Tajik of anything.  Here, for example, E104421 accuses Tajik of something, provides diffs and evidence, but another user who is a friend of Tajik's jumps in, just like they did against me, and accuses E104421 of stalking Tajik, with no diffs, no support, nothing, just throwing accusations around.  As I said, when I provided diffs, when I supported my accusations, I was ignored by administrators, as is currently happening on WP:PAIN, and I was attacked by Tajik's supporters throwing around accusations anywhere and for any reason against anyone who asks for civil behaviour on the part of Tajik. And, again, administrators simply ignore supported accusations against Tajik--and seem to allow, and by allowing, encourage unsupported accusations against anyone who asks for civility from Tajik. This is exactly what happened to me, I provided evidence, I supported my accusations, I made a proper complaint, but Tajik simply uses a handy administrator, has friends accuse anyone who edits the same page as he does of stalking, and gets away with it time and again--Wikipedia does indeed allow editors, certain editors, to "simply throw around accusations anywhere and for any reason." The user who posted this stalking accusation against E104421 hasn't been told he's not allowed to throw around accusations, because it appears he is allowed to--in fact, anyone supporting Tajik is allowed to throw around accusations on Wikipedia. KP Botany 00:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Spiritualism rating
Hello InShanee. Please take a look at the talk pages on Spiritualism before replacing the rating again. Thanks Anthon.Eff 04:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * And while we're at it, please also leave some knowledgable comments at the talk page for Reincarnation Research, as well, since you have chosen to provide the rating. Thanks Anthon.Eff 04:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Take a look at the Talk:Spiritualism page for my response. If comments are not forthcoming in a few days, I will remove the paranormal banner, since so far it has just attracted editors who know almost nothing about the history of this religious movement. Anthon.Eff 05:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You do not have the right to do so, and you will treat other editors with respect. --InShaneee 05:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I left you one further response on Talk:Spiritualism, InShaneee. Anthon.Eff 05:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Bikini Speedbandits
Actually, no need to tag the article, go ahead and delete it. I put the delete tag on a couple of weeks ago, outraged at the slur on my country, and then thought, what the heck, keep it, rewritten to inform people that the supposed traffic control policy was simply a satirical public relations campaign. You're the administrator, delete it. Anthon.Eff 01:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

FYI
Just thought I should let you know about this discussion that concerns you. Regards, Newyorkbrad 03:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Ferrylodge
Hello, InShaneee. As the blocking admin in this case, I'd like to request that you comment further in this post and this post, in order to clear up any confusion. Thank you. -Severa (!!!) 22:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to OGame (3RR)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Happy New Year Cocoaguycontribstalk 03:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Bionicle
Please stop reverting. There is no page or no infomation aka 'article not found' on Wikipedia about Bob Thompson. If you 'click' on Bob Thompson as a lurker the page will say 'Article not found. There is no 'citation' or any source about the two people. Plus it is already mention in the Bionicle page that both of them worked for the LEGO Group. There is no reason to repeat the information again. Also when anyone is on the Bionicle page and not sign in shows (citiation needed) and Bob Thompson in red. If there is information for both of them THEN do add the infotmation with the 'citation'. But when you click on 'citation needed' it goes to 'wikipedia: citing sources'. Bottom line the page look sloppy. If you know someone to fix the problem, it would be great. I hope you understand what I am talking about. Thanks, --GoTLG  23:45, 26 Janurary 2007 (UTC)

New CZ group -- Inshanee take note please.
'' Comment moved from your user page. -- Gogo Dodo 09:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC) ''

The International Cryptozoological Society is located at http://www.internationalcryptozoologicalsociety.org and requests you take note of it. Run by Wikipedia-listed Jon-Erik Beckjord. Thank you.

Beckjord