User talk:In Vita Veritas/sandbox

Hi
Hi, how are you? It's Shrinwanti, a graduate student of Biological Sciences. I hope we'll be enjoying this course this semester. Shrinwanti Ghosh (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I’m doing well and I hope you’re right about us enjoying the semester.In Vita Veritas (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Peer review feedback goes here!
This is where the peer review feedback for In Vita Veritas sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer review questions

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone?

Yes, the content does not contain any bias.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines?

Yes, the citations use review articles rather than primary sources. It follows the MERS guidelines.

Are the citations formatted correctly?

The citations appear to be formatted correctly except the numbering. It appears the sources list 1, 2, 3, then 1, 2, 3, again.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article?

Yes, I think Organ Rejection is a good section to add to the article. It makes sense and provides useful information.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to?

They could add to the subcategories of the Medical uses heading.

Mill2488 (talk) 18:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review Feedback
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes, the content is written in a neutral, unbiased tone.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes, the citations follow the MEDRS guidelines.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes, the citations are formatted correctly.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to. Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? I believe that it does make sense because the author is adding clarity and additional information.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? The author could expand on the diagnostic advantages portion of the main article, or add onto one of the areas of "medical usage".

JM1915 (talk)JM1915 — Preceding undated comment added 20:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)