User talk:In et Out

WP:ANI
Hi there, I have reverted your contribution to the discussion (see my undo here). Per the second point at Sockpuppetry, this is a "discussion internal to the project", and I don't believe the limited exceptions apply here. It would be more appropriate for you to use your primary account for this purpose; if you do not wish to do so for some reason, you may share this with a Functionary, who are trusted with handling sensitive matters or off-wiki private evidence (see Functionaries). Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Daniel, thanks for the clarification. Unfortunately, my primary account is blocked for some reasons. If you could recommend an editor on the list who I can directly contact, I would be thankful cause I have emailed the Arbitration Committee before and never got a reply. Or you can help with providing a mailing list where you can check my email that would help too in case you would like to take the responsibility to investigate. As you can see here, GSS has previous knowledge that the article creator is connected to the subject, how could he know that?? and since I have emailed Celestina with the evidence, why they didn't take any step forward? I think GSS may be involved or received compensation to step away. Why is the side talk by mail?? I just wanted to show that they do not strate to vandalism or spamming as claiming.

Let me know what do you think. Thanks! In et Out (talk) 01:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, I am not a functionary so cannot assist with any private evidence or emails etc. My recommendation for you is to either re-email the Arbitration Committee, or alternatively sit tight and see if a functionary weighs into the ANI conversation - if they do, you can then know they have at least a passing interest in the topic, and you can then email them. The list of functionaries is in the link I provided earlier. Cheers, and apologies I could not be of more help, Daniel (talk) 02:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hi, thanks very much for blocking me and bothering other editors who were involved in WP:ANI/Celestina instead of investigating the case I have discussed with Daniel. You should ask her why she ignored the evidence I have sent her instead of blocking me and using your power here to hide the fact that she may be a straight person and invloved in paid editing work. Shame on you. In et Out (talk) 14:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Block appeals should go on the talk page of your original account (or to WP:UTRS/Arbcom), credible allegations of paid editing should go to, and your personal musings about editors' sexualities should go absolutely nowhere because they are both ridiculous and reprehensible. I suggest you drop it. -- Blablubbs (talk) 14:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)