User talk:In fact/Archive 4

Al-Farabi
Good day ! Why you're reverting my editions without explaining any your reason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majilis (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, simply because you changed the sourced materials without prior discussion in the article's talk page. In fact 08:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Excuse me? I did not change anything except added some more sources which are auhtentic, you are not aware of the facts, please go and study the materials i presented to you, everything is there, such a behaviour in an public page is not acceptable, please behave yourself otherwise i'll complain to the wikipedia admins — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majilis (talk • contribs) 09:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Jābir ibn Hayyān
I started a discussion on Talk:Jābir ibn Hayyān concerning your reverts and dubious claims and so far you've made no effort to take part in that. This is not your dad's website to order me to "stop it" and then walk away because you don't like it. Al-Andalusi (talk) 22:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry to be late in here, as I am very busy in real life. I did not notice you have started a new discussion there, as I have 427 pages on my watchlist (excluding talk pages), and I randomly check them if I am online. However assuming good faith and showing civility, it was good to ping me here. As I really thought that my reason was so clear that no one is going to question it any longer. Now, I am going to answer it. In fact 08:02, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

al-Farabi
I noticed that you removed my last edit on al-Farabi page without giving any explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majilis (talk • contribs) 01:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * It would have been better practice to have enhanced your edit summary—at least to something like "rv, see talk page". Or, see the edit summary on the edit I just made to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear C.Fred, In general you are absolutely right. But looking at his contributions and the fact that I already know this user for his dubious and POV pushing edits, I think simply stating "rv" was enough. With many regards, In fact 04:57, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Iraqi Kurdistan national football team
Yeah, that should be moved as well. It doesn't represent a country! GiantSnowman 11:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
I'm glad that you like "mine" article Persian Gulf, but I have to notice you that it's actually tiny one comparing to main article Geography of Iran, or other geographic-related ones like Tehran. Such articles are much better then both English or Persian versions, but if you want to improve them it won't be hard because most references are English or Persian. Bedrud! Mr. O. --109.165.242.123 (talk) 18:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Wow ! great job. I am really happy. In fact 08:51, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Rumi
Hi Can you check the recent edits in Rumi? It goes against WP:weight and WP:undo. They need to quote authoritative scholars such as Franklin Lewis.

Thank you --96.255.251.165 (talk) 07:40, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
I wanted to thank you for looking out for vandalisms in various webpages..you might want to see [] and here:..incase of future vandalisms..--108.18.145.11 (talk) 03:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Musa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Ardebil
Hi Mr. In fact! I think "Ardebil" is more official and Common than "Ardabil". because in Persian script we don't have "a e o" so it's hard to find out which one is more common and official but most of Iranians use "Ardebil" than "Ardabil". What do you think about this? -- Mervzi (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, Mervzi, Please kindly read Naming conventions (geographic names). The best name for that article is Ardabil.
 * Feel free to ask me, in case you have any questions. In fact 04:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Safir English Language Academy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Safir English Language Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Safir English Language Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 16:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note. I just added some sources to the AfD. Please kindly have a look at them. In fact 06:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kish Institute of Science and Technology


The article Kish Institute of Science and Technology has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MohandesWiki 20:37, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Commons hamadan church photo
I swa and used your photo on Holy Mary Church, Hamadan. I do not think that the name is ok. Are you sure about it? Please see File talk. Cheers Kipala (talk) 10:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am. I answered you in that talk page. In fact 20:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Qaraghaj, Tabriz
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Qaraghaj, Tabriz &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Nanuvutpanther (talk) 07:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Images
Could you please stop trying to force your own images on several articles? It's not constructive. --HistoryofIran (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Dear
 * First of all, I should thank you for all your efforts regarding Persian history. I do appreciate.
 * Regarding the images I replaced recently, I should say that it's not the matter of my own images really. As I stated in the edit summary, I tried to replace the brand new images with the old ones. Not to mention that the quality of the cameras today are better than those in 2007.
 * I'm always ready to hear from you. In fact 09:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The quality doesn't really look any better though, maybe it's the lightning/weather. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:25, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't want to insist on my changes, as I was doing them in good faith. In fact 03:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lady Urmia


The article Lady Urmia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since April 2020."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Lady Urmia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lady Urmia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lady Urmia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:34, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:ISIRI standards has been nominated for deletion
Category:ISIRI standards has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)