User talk:Inaccuratereporting

May 2022
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Ana Navarro. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 00:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Inaccuratereporting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Media bias did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. – S. Rich (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Priscilla Giddings. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at David Wolfe (raw food advocate), you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Ratcliffe (American politician)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tow (talk) 02:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)