User talk:Inai09

Edits by me
Hi, could you please note that I responded to your claims |here. I have to apologise if I my edits gave the wrong impression. NarSakSasLee (talk) 09:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, you may want to see this NarSakSasLee (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

3RR notice
You are engaged in an edit war on the page Urine therapy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Carbon Rodney 14:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps a little confused
I just wanted to let you know that your edit summary here that says, "Admins - pls check!!" shows that you may misunderstand how Wikipedia works. Admins have no special control over content. As far as content disputes go, admins are exactly the same as any other editor. In fact, no one on Wikipedia holds special authority to make content decisions--all work is done by consensus, governed by policy, and using dispute resolution as necessary. Admins are merely users who've been granted, by the community, the ability to block people who break certain policies, protect pages from edit warring, etc. Note that even though I'm an admin, since I'm making content decisions on that page, I cannot take any administrative actions with regards to that page, per WP:INVOLVED. Perhaps the only thing that it means is that I probably (though not certainly) have a deeper knowledge of our policies than other editors...but even there, there are certainly things I don't know. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)