User talk:InarZan

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, InarZan! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! User:Marek69. 14:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulasyam
A tag has been placed on Pulasyam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 12:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chithravadham
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chithravadham, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 10:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)


 * There were zero google hits on this topic; it appears to be made up. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 10:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Chithravadham
I have nominated Chithravadham, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chithravadham. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 22:03, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Who?
In March of this year, you wrote Script Analysis, referencing "Young".

Who's this "Young" person? DS (talk) 15:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Sanctions
I feel that you should be made aware of the general sanctions that apply to the Caste system in Kerala article. I attach the formal explanation below. - Sitush (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Caste system in Kerala
Hi. As you are the editor wanting to add material to the article Caste system in Kerala, and it has been disputed and reverted, the onus is on you to get a consensus in support of the changes you wish to make - and you must not re-add the new material unless you can get that consensus. I've protected the article for a week to give you time to discuss it and seek consensus - if you add it again without consensus, you may be blocked in accordance with the sanctions outlined above. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

RSN
I notice that you have been asking various questions at WP:RSN regarding the reliability of sources in relation, broadly speaking, to the Saint Thomas Christians. That is fine, but it would be courteous to let others know that you are doing so when you raise the query there. Since these issues usually start with a discussion at an article talk page, you could simply leave a note in that discussion saying that you have asked & linking to the RSN thread. Your colleague-in-arms,, has chosen to take a similar approach to you and, frankly, I find it to be in very poor taste. Wikipedia is a collegial environment and going behind the backs of people, which is how your actions could be construed, is not at all helpful. In a worst case scenario, you could be arguing that something is reliable, I might be arguing the opposite, you take it to RSN and get a verdict that you do not like ... and because you do not like it you might choose not to let me know that consensus is in fact in my favour. Basically, you are opening yourself up to all sorts of accusations of bad faith etc. Please, think again about this method of operating. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Examples of what I have found:
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard
 * Reliable sources/Noticeboard
 * There may of course be others. - Sitush (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * And indeed there is at least one more. This is appalling behaviour. - Sitush (talk) 08:57, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Take care
Hi, you recently deleted content at Talk:Saint Thomas Christians. I assume that this was an error and I have reverted you. Please take care. - Sitush (talk) 08:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello InarZan2
Something went wrong here. Arcandam (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was a technical error. Thanks. -  InarZan   Verifiable  18:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

comment
Dear InarZan, there is an on going discussion that I need to inform you about. Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robin klein (talk) 00:51, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Help me
Can someone move User talk:InarZan2 to User talk:InarZan. I want User talk:InarZan2 to redirect to User talk:InarZan. Not vice versa. Most importantly, I am not being notified when there is a new message in User talk:InarZan2.--  InarZan   Verifiable  13:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

✅ Andie  ''  ▶Candy◀  15:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for ur suggestion at INB....VSVettakkorumakansnehi (talk) 15:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Varghese Payapilly Palakkappilly
We are going to have to go through either a RfC or a Requested move for Varghese Payapilly Palakkappilly. There is no point in all this to-ing and fro-ing between the various possible names - it could go on for ever, whereas the outcome of a formal process would achieve stability. - Sitush (talk) 06:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

"Chithravadham" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Chithravadham and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 23:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)