User talk:Incendiary Iconoclasm

Hugo Chávez
Hello, the reason why there are two Vice President sections within the infobox is, mainly, because there were differing Vice Presidents between his two spells in office—pre-coup, and then post-coup. For example, his Vice President at the time, Diosdado Cabello, preceded him as the Acting President of Venezeula for simply a few hours before he re-assumed his duties solely as VP again. Neve-selbert (talk) 18:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I had to revert your recent edit as your view on the chronological order is reverse to the norm: the most recent tenure always appears above those tenures beforehand. Please take articles Harold Wilson, Benjamin Netanyahu, Victor Ponta, and Grover Cleveland, as examples of this. Neve-selbert (talk) 02:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, that order really seem to be the norm. However, that is very confusing. I was staring at those two "in offices" of Hugo Chávez. and it took me quite a long time to understand what that meant.  Incendiary  Iconoclasm  03:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Manners
Please do not attack others as you did here and here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Déjà vu?
Are you Tetra quark? Isambard Kingdom (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Sock Puppet Investigation
I am informing you that I have initiated a sock puppet investigation concerning you:. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

block
What? I'm not anybody's "sock". You can't just block me like that, with no explanation whatsoever!  Incendiary  Iconoclasm  20:11, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Warning about image
I strongly suggest you to re-add the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field image back in the Universe article. Let me bring your attention to the fact that there is a consensus in the talk page, and it indicates that the HUDF image is more appropriate. Also, if you check out the Universe article in other languages, you'll see that most of them use the HUDF image, and I don't see why it should be any different here. Thanks  Incendiary  Iconoclasm  15:45, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Tetra quark, I know you are obsessed with this issue, but at this point, after multiple abuses on your part, I don't think your opinion matters much. The lead has been discussed at other times, see, for example , and I'm sure it will continue to be discussed in the future. As for you, I think it is more important that you sort out your own problems. Sincerely, Isambard Kingdom (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Seriously though, the image of the HUDF is much more appropriate and friendly to the readers. It doesn't matter that the CMB image was there when the article reached the good article status. The article isn't a good article because of that image, specifically (having an image is required).  Incendiary  Iconoclasm  22:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but since you are "blocked" and since I believe you are now supposed to use your talk page only to discuss being "unblocked", I don't feel comfortable discussing the particulars of an article. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been part of the discussion in the Universe article about the lead image, and clearly the most appropriate image was the HUDF one. Can you please just add it into the article? It is much more relevant for the reader. Thanks.  Incendiary  Iconoclasm  18:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)