User talk:Incognito84

May 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Executive Order 11110, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Not supported by the sources which clearly state the exact opposite of your edit. You're welcome to discuss on the talk page, but you need to bring reliable sources that support the edit.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to User talk:Ravensfire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please don't change my user talk page again.  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Executive Order 11110. ''Enough - stop adding unsourced and WP:FRINGE information to the article. Discuss the edits on the talk page if you would like, but stop adding patently false nonsense to the article.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Executive Order 11110 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Ravensfire  (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2023 (UTC)