User talk:Incutonez

Speedy deletion of Carpet stains
A tag has been placed on Carpet stains requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 21:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Re deletions
(copied from Carpet Stains talk page) It works on a sort of consensus basis, following certain rules. There are so many small bands, some of which last for days only, that it's almost impossible to keep track of them. When you've een editing here for a bit, you see much stuff that's rubbish, much stuff that's not supportably notable, and some stuff that fits the encyclopaedia. I'm a musician myself, and am not trying to list my former groups on here. They were locally notable in their genre, but we didn't reach a wide enough audience for notability to set in. (I have in one outfit played to a crowd of 10,000, however.) Reading your article, I can't see any value in including it. I'm not administrator level, so I won't be deleting it. Get the band together, get something recorded. sell more than a few hundred copies - get known. Then come back. Sorry, but Wikipedia can only list you after you've made it one way or another. We can't help you do it. Peridon (talk) 22:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gmalt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gmalt.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:13, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:BenKenneyBass.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BenKenneyBass.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)