User talk:Independent789

August 2015
Your recent editing history at Stonewall (2015 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 23:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You should take a look at my note on the article talk page before editing the Stonewall (2015 film) article again. Abecedare (talk) 01:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Stonewall (2015 film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Abecedare (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The block is for this edit, which you made without any attempt at discussing the issue despite the clear warning and note above. Abecedare (talk) 02:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, Independent789, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -- Irn (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

This account is often accessed on an open university network/computer for class. Others may be editing the same articles on the same network. Thank you for your concern! Independent789 (talk) 22:30, 24 September 2015 (UTC)