User talk:Indian50

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Spartian 02:46, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Hi.

India related links
Hi, you may want to have a look at WP:IUP if you have not already done so. Welcome!! --Spartian 03:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Sukhoi Su-30 MKI
First off, I like to apologize for taking so long to respond. I wasn't editing for a while. Second off, I like to thankyou for your support in my edit. However, I myself do not have a very strong opinion on whether or not that section should be there. The only reason I had edited that section was because there was a heading with nothing in it. Now that the person has removed the section completely, I find that its not a problem, since no other fighter jets have that section in their page. The page does have a list of comparable planes, and I do believe it is enough, since we already have a page specially made for the purpose of exact/indepth comparison, and its becomes redundent to relist them. However, if you do have a strong opinion on the issue, please to make a poll on the page's discussion page, and I will definitely vote. Thankyou --Steven 21:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks
I did the mirage 2000 article too, it was not at all having any technical info. Can we write like this? "Su-30MKI is regarded as superior in capabilities to the earlier versions of F-15 aircraft of the USAF." I mean Su-30MKI Never faced any F-15, It was Su-30K and USAF have their own reasons for what all happened. anywayz i am happy, after 3 yrs of waiting finally Agni-III is tested.

about the image copy rights
I don't have much idea abt copyrights But i took one picture from www.aeronautics.ru. it Says All information presented on this site, in whole or in part, may not under any circumstances be copied, reverse engineered, resold, redistributed or used on an Internet site for purposes of any kind without prior written permission from respective copyright holders Some other from Bharat Rakshak. Most of the images are from http://vayu-sena.tripod.com and it has no copyright information. what should i add more in to the comments of the images?

Hello! §ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 17:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, pleased to meet you, too. I am fine. How are you? §ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 22:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I come from New Delhi. What about you?§ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 00:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

So you can speak Punjabi.Wait, you do live in Punjab (india)? I understand Hindi but very little Punjabi. Do you live in Punjab or do you live in U.S. ?§ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 18:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

So you live abroad. Are you a teenager?§ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 02:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Long time no speak. How are you? §ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 16:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

It's fine, and I am doing well. Oh ok so your 19 almost 20. Cool. §ǫŋα Κäйĩкá Çђøωδħаŕψ 23:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Greetings!
I am pleased to meet you. :-) utcursch | talk 07:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Template
I blocked the user for one week, and I hope that will prevent them from coming back and vandalising. I'm not totally familiar with the subject area, but I have seen that many of the contributing edits to the page were done by established editors. So, I have decided to semi-protect the page from vandalism by anons and new users. Nish kid 64  13:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Manmohan Singh
Manmohan Singh has never won a direct election.I put Natwar singh's remarks on him in Controversies with the ref.Why was it reverted ?just want to know.I feel it is a valied point that he never even a muncipal election in his career and is the Prime Minister of the country.Harlowraman

Re:Jat
Unfortunately, I only could see fit to block the user for a period of one week. The IP is used by many people, and I don't want to block the IP for a long time as this would prevent a good number of people from editing on Wikipedia.  Nish kid 64  20:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a shared IP, and if I were to block that IP, I would run into many problems and possibly get in trouble. I'm sorry man, but I can't block the user. The multiple people under that IP address have been making both good and bad edits, and I don't see a block a really punitive measure right now.  Nish kid 64  01:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Reference on Punjab (India)
References have to pass several criteria to be included in Wikipedia. Most important, they must be reliable and verifiable: see WP:RS and WP:V. Unfortunately, the reference you have repeatedly inserted into this article (http://www.punjabonline.in/Profile/) does not constitute a reliable source. It is an unreferenced, unsourced paragraph on a site that offers no information about the author or the reliability of the author's assertions. You are welcome to find another source for the statement you find to be so important for the article, but for the time being - it should be removed until a source that meets the requirements of Wikipedia's policies can be found. Thanks. Nposs 03:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:Punjabi culture dispute
Hi - first of all, please do not violate WP:CIV/WP:NPA - that warning you left Tuncrypt on his talkpage is not acceptable - it is a threat. Neither should you edit-war like this (this goes for Tuncrypt as well). If ever you have disputes that you can't seem to resolve, seek the help of others by pursuing dispute resolution.

Secondly, the passage does violate WP:NPOV - the problem is not the sources, which are OK, but the tone and wordings of the sentence - merely saying that "Punjabi culture is tolerant, progressive" etc. is a generalization and an opinion, especially as there have been so many examples of the opposite. You must write in an encyclopedic tone, with respect for all points of view and foundation with facts. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 13:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi Rama's arrow, first the sentence and source is about historic punjabi culture not modern. The problem is this guy is intolerant of others views and sources--Indian50 02:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * With regard to gujarati gammar page there are many uncited claims that i have right to put on and put up a banner saying there is uncited sources. The same standards must be applied to all pages. And object to Tuncrypt calling the gujarati gammar page his page. Thanks.--Indian50 02:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

1-week block
I've blocked you for 1 week for violating WP:CIV/WP:NPA, WP:EW, WP:3RR, WP:SOCK and harassing another user. Please be more careful and respectful in the future. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 02:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)