User talk:IndianBio/Archive 28

You Don't Love Me (No, No, No)
Was there something wrong with the references? — Calvin999 09:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Many of them were depreciated since the Hung Medien website changed plus when singlechart can generate all the references for you, why would you hard code and waste around 3K of space? — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It was was quite a long time ago. I'm not a fan of the single template. — Calvin999  09:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Why aren't you? Its easy, hassle free, does not need manual update of urls when a website becomes dead, plus it saves ginormous amount of article hard-space, which I believe is one of the most important things about the template. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I just prefer hard coding it. There's nothing wrong with it and it works just as well. Just what I'm used to. — Calvin999  10:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha Calvin, lemme "Upgrade U". — I B  [ Poke  ] 10:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Notability of U2 song articles
In reference to your current redirects to several U2 song articles, please note that your edits will be reverted. While attempting to be bold and make these major edits, you failed to contact the articles' respective WikiProject or their primary editors. Additionally, you redirected one article within less than one hour of an edit by its primary editor. By claiming these articles grossly failed WP:NSONGS, you grossly failed to read the first sentence of the notability requirements: Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. U2 is one of the most popular bands in the world, and as a result, there are plenty of sources available for almost every song they have released, whether or not they are referenced in the article at the current moment. A perfect example is Slug (song), which was released by U2 as part of a side project and is currently undergoing a nomination for featured article despite never being released as a single, appearing on song charts, performed live, or being part of a best-selling album. Please contact relevant editors or WikiProjects before making such a decision for future reference. – Dream out loud (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I edit primarily music articles only and I know when those articles fail the criteria they do. Now the next step will be to AFD them. And I don't need to contact a major editor if I feel an article should not exists. Anyways, lets discuss this at AFD then. — I B  [ Poke  ] 08:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

FAC: Agharta (album)
Hi. Would you be interested in reviewing/commenting on my nomination of Agharta (album) for featured status? There've been a few users who have already commented, but I'm hoping to expedite the review process in hopes of nominating another article, so I'd like to ask if you could as well. Dan56 (talk) 05:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thunder (Leona Lewis song)
Any idea as to how I can retrieve the links for Slovakia and Czech Rep please? — Calvin999 08:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Here is the Czech link and here is the Slovakia link. You have the Slovakia link wrong though. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah thanks. They were right to begin with but the archives won't show up on their websites anymore. — Calvin999  09:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * you just have to click on the song's name in the particular week's chart. It gives you the whole chart run. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * They were showing this weeks chart when I clicked on the link though? — Calvin999  09:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * They will always show the current chart as the main chart. Old charts you would either need to click on the date and find out, else click on the song and retrieve the chart run url which I gave you above. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay. I looked on her name on the links you gave me and the only song with a chart position in Thunder. — Calvin999  09:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Because the digital chart was introduced in 2014 I believe, and well Leona does not have a chart power anyways. So "Thunder" is probably her only charting on the Digital Chart. She may have better prowess on the Radio Top 100. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah yeah. — Calvin999  09:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Omar Mateen page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=726177341 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F726177341%7COmar Mateen%5D%5D Ask for help])
 * Thanks, these are corrected now. — I B  [ Poke  ] 11:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Ain't Your Mama
I got a warning, don't know if it was from you or anything. Why Bulgaria and Indonesia in not accurate when I edit this chart but for Beyonce's 6 Inch and Nick Jonas Close is acceptable. Please...! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.129.188.186 (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

File:TheSign2.jpg
I invite you to discuss this image at FFD. --George Ho (talk) 06:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Another image: File:The Cranberries - Dreams (US single cover).jpg. --George Ho (talk) 07:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks :)
Hi, how are you? I've been off from Wiki because I was really busy in real life. I came here just to thank you for keeping your work in here and help us to keep Gaga's articles "safe". I miss editing lol Gaga Nutella talk 22:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I wish you are back editing the Gaga articles too. Wish you are here fill time haha. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Madonna
Hello indianBio, how r u? I just dropped by to ask you, if once you're done with the 'Bedtime Stories' article, perhaps we could begin working on the remaining 'Ray of Light' articles and 'Beautiful Stranger' (I began something here), also let's not forget this song. That is all, I'm currently somewhat retired form wiki as school and work takes up most of my time. But I'll be back to help in any way I can. Hope all is well! --Chrishm21 (talk) 22:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi sorry for the delay in reply, yes I have finished the BS articles now. I might look over to "Beautiful Stranger" now just to have a random article. Thank you for sharing your sandbox. — I B   [ Poke  ] 13:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Oh wow, mind you, I am foul mouthed also :P — I B  [ Poke  ] 14:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Big lol... Never mind, as long as you keep improving the quality of Madonna's articles. Nice to see such a dedicated editor, I haven't seen one since Leg**as2186 hahaha Bluesatellite (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * God, that editor added such useless content always praising Madonna. And got caught trying to improvise lol. Anyways, sorry for barging in the discussion at the Talk:List of best-selling music artists, was really irritated by the user's comment. — I B  [ Poke  ] 14:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Despite his questionable input, his dedication was unbelievably great. He devoted a lot of time for M's WikiProject. As for that discussion, yeah it's annoying to see that he dismissed others' opinion but one certain user (whom he worships *sigh). Actually he doesn't bother to read the whole discussion, nor trying to understand the new methodology. Bluesatellite (talk) 14:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah that's what irritated me. Anyways thanks for the barnstar Blue, hope to work with you soon again. :) — I B  [ Poke  ] 14:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your advice
Hi there. I noticed this edit cautioning an editor about edit warring. I've been struggling to work with that editor and have had nothing but frustration. Would you have a moment to look at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and then "User:Xboxmanwar reported by User:Magnolia677"? You seem to have good advice. I'm not quite sure how I should have handled this differently. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You did correct reporting him, although you should have done it much before. Xbox although has good intentions, but his continuous battleground mentality and personal attacks make him/her disruptive. He was just blocked for EW and attacks, hope learns his lesson. — I B  [ Poke  ] 22:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * My post on the edit warring board didn't work so well. It seems four of my reverts were within 24 hours.  Perhaps dispute resolution may work better.  Thanks again.  Magnolia677 (talk) 01:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

purpose album certifications
brail and mexico certifications are from universal music mexico and brazil which officially declare certifications.please donot alter it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubhamco (talk • contribs) 11:13, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * You have been responded in the article talk page. Please continue discussing there. — I B  [ Poke  ] 12:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Online Music Awards
Hi. I did a lot of research and discovered that Online Music Awards and the UK Online Music Awards are two different events. Madonna was awarded during the UK Online Music Awards, in 2001. Online Music Awards only happened in 2011 and 2012, and it is a UK-based awards ceremony for unsigned musicians, and she was not nominated for any award. I suppose that's why originally there was no link to the Online Music Awards wikipedia page.

Johnnyboytoy (talk) 23:14, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow good find then! — I B  [ Poke  ] 23:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

What do you think
...of this? FrB.TG (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I think its nice, and probably would be expanded? — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Rise (Katy Perry song)
In case I can't always tend to this, it would be nice if you and/or other frequent music article editors could keep a watch on it for original research additions. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 06:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * literally JUST did it. And I love it! — I B  [ Poke  ] 08:41, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I love it too! So glad she finally released new music :D!! <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 13:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * yes me to! I tried searching for the songwriter names, but BMI repertoire still does not list it. So its good that the article was protected. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * That's probably because it was a surprise release and the site hasn't been updated yet. Either way, Today and NBC Sports both say she wrote it. The protection does help. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 13:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I know, I saw that but there will be other co-writers and now since Max Martin is supposedly involved, he's not gonna let a songwriter chance go away. Plus you never know if the asshole Dr. Luke is also involved. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Max is involved and produced it, but nothing from Luke. She also stated he's not part of it here. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 13:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. That's good then. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

List of cover versions of Madonna songs
Hello IndianBio. I am the person who attempted to add in information concerning Lacuna Coil's cover of Live to Tell. The reason for the second reversion appears to be that I have not added a proper source first. Does a link to the appropriate Wikipedia article not suffice? This isn't something I do very often so the finer points of Wiki etiquette may be lost on me, if so I would appreciate some guidance. Thank you in advance. SynbiosSwordsman (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello you can refer to WP:CITATION. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Files for discussion/2016 May 15
I invite you to improve consensus on the files that I'm nominating for discussion. --George Ho (talk) 20:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/92.9.30.228
Can you keep an eye of the IP because the IP involved genre warring. 115.164.191.21 (talk) 12:12, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I have requested protection for All I Ever Wanted. That should do it. — I B  [ Poke  ] 12:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Lady Gaga
Why did you delete my edit about LG's relationship with Taylor Kinney? It wasn't "defamatory" nor was it a BLP violation. It was well sourced and well written. There was no other mention of their relationship aside from a blurb about their proposal that I removed and included in my passage. I chose the 2015-Present section because there isn't a personal life section.Mariahfan999 (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * you have been warned time and time again NOT to add libelous content to BLP articles which are definitely not true and fail WP:CRYSTAL. In this case you added about Gaga's break with Taylor Kinney using third party sources which are claiming that they are breaking up. That is bad journalism on their part and just shoddy decision on your part as an editor to take a decision on a BLP. Please never make hasty decisions to add content to BLP about personal relationships. — I B  [ Poke  ] 14:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)


 * None of the things I have put in were libelous. It is not bad journalism if they include the instagram post in which she clearly states they have been taking a break. I didn't say that they broke up, I said with direct quotation "taking a break". Those are the exact words she used. And in terms of the Mariah Carey page, nothing I have added on there has been libelous. James Packer and Mariah are engaged. It's not a whirlwind relationship like her marriage to Nick Cannon. They publicly came out as a couple last year, and were probably together in 2014. Mariah has talked time and time again about being engaged. Most people would consider that a partnership.


 * I understand that I'm new here. I don't have 37k edits to my name. But I'm not an idiot. I'm nineteen. I've been a huge fan of Mariah since I was nine. I have over 270 of her songs on my phone, including live performances and unreleased recordings I spent hours converting from youtube to MP3. I'm also a huge fan of Gaga. I threw all kinds of fits and tantrums to see the Monster Ball. The last thing I want to do on either of those pages is to introduce libelous content. However, ever since I started editing I feel as if you have been continuously biting me. Every time I introduce a new passage it has been deleted, no matter how relevant and/or accurate it is. I would like to refer you to the BLP zealot and Please do not bite the newcomers essays.Mariahfan999 (talk) 14:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I did not revert your edit to the Lady Gaga article, did. The very fact that you have continued additions when multiple users have reverted it, makes me believe you still do not understand the libelous information part and would probably continue to do so. I really do not care how much of a fan you are. What you are doing on the articles not only fails WP:CRYSTAL as well as WP:RECENTISM, you are also edit warring over it, when instead per WP:BRD you should discuss in talk page and come to consensus. Which would be better for you not to harp in my talk page and go and do it exactly. — I B   [ Poke  ] 15:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your fixes. Would you have the time to do a source review? czar 20:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes I can thanks. — I B  [ Poke  ] 10:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Rise (Katy Perry song)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evita (soundtrack), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remixed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Make Me...
What is seriously wrong with you, "dude"? I'm not wrong; there's a radio countdown in Australia and it's confirmed on there before ARIA updates. But fine, wanna be anal about it, well, we'll see in 12 or so minutes.  Ss 112  07:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * And I wouldn't criticise anybody for being an edit warrior. That's exactly what you're doing right back.  Ss 112  07:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh please, save me the sanctimonious lecture . You very well know why that was reverted. And if you cannot be patient to add a source before it updates to reflect the actual verifiable content, then I will revert it. And reverting a blatant false edit is not warring over it. It won't hurt you to wait before ARIA updates before going on a rampage of updating charts will you? — I B  [ Poke  ] 07:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because something hasn't updated, doesn't make it false or WP:OR, dude. It's an assumption to say it's original research if I'm later proved correct (and I will be). Also, I really fail to see how one sentence is a "sanctimonious lecture". Overexaggeration much? And no, I never said it would hurt me, but the information is correct and thankfully nobody is as anal about it.  Ss 112  07:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If the information is correct, then wait till the source (ARIA) upates. As you said, 12 minutes, impatient much? — I B  [ Poke  ] 07:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * no one said that the information was incorrect. I clearly pointed out your impatience to wait till the source updated and then add it. So don't do an asshole revert and then come home crying. — I B  [ Poke  ] 08:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I noticed your edit summary saying "your [...] WP:OR is no concern of mine"... yet you did concern yourself with it. Also, I find that assertion hypocritical coming from you, and I don't know what the hell "come home crying" even means in this context—but I don't care.  Ss 112  08:09, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes it is, because it seems you go on adding these content when the source hasn't updated. If you think I can trace all your edits and monitor them. But yeah, if its an article I am monitoring, sorry bae, you are not allowed to add false content which is not verifiable. — I B  [ Poke  ] 08:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * "Bae"? Now you're just using plainly silly words to condescend to me. Thanks for the Wikipedia lecture and the veiled threat ("I will revert you on any article I'm monitoring"), but it's not "false" content. You again contradicted yourself—you just said "nobody said it was incorrect", yet you're again saying it's "false". It becomes verifiable. That's a hell of a lot different from others who add content that is plainly false and will never be verifiable because it's made up.  Ss 112  08:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, don't start "correcting" my edits by using a singlechart template with a note. You're giving primary place to a source that has not updated and will not update for days, and you are in the wrong. Notes are okay if the page will update in a matter of hours; days no. I update to a singlechart template for every page when australian-charts.com updates; you don't need to write little condescending edit summaries as if I'm unaware of what I'm doing. Wait, and do not edit war over this.  Ss 112  08:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Who knows? That fucking radio countdown that you listen can get it wrong. See how this works? So wait till official chart body updates and then add it. It can be false, it might be correct, but its all a fucking crystal ball unless its verifiable. Simple concept, and as for your edits, yes I never said it was incorrect to add a chart, but the information would be deemed false if its not present in the source. Unverifiable only applies if I cannot even see the source. And yes, I will revert if its a content which is not supported by the source, ergo, false content. And pretty sure, deep inside you know that you were wrong to add content before source updates, so yeah stop posting here. — I B  [ Poke  ] 08:24, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I will, but i just want to say, that radio countdown is officially ARIA's debut of their top 40; they are in partnership with ARIA and have never gotten it wrong aside from when ARIA provided them with incomplete sales data once. In future, can you please conduct a conversation without swearing? Just because it's your talk page doesn't give you the right to swear at people because you're mad. Remain calm.  Ss 112  08:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

List of best-selling music artists
What "note about how the list is updated" do you keep refering to ? Clausgroi (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please read the second and third box in Talk:List of best-selling music artists. And please discuss your changes in the talk page. — I B  [ Poke  ] 18:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Genesis has 39,9 million certified sales out of the 150 million claimed, which correspond to more than 26%. The box reads: "To be on this list, artists who began charting before 1975 are required to have their available claimed figures supported by 20% in certified units". I still can't see the problem. Be objective and specific instead of making me go to the article and read loads of text. Clausgroi (talk) 18:40, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please discuss inclusion of any sales update in the article talk page and not just because the Daily Telegraph said so. Genesis' certification may well be adhering to the claimed sales, that does not mean that it is not inflated. You just had a big discussion on this with, don't you understand this? — I B  [ Poke  ] 18:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Just noticed this. Don't even bother writing here. Go to the article talk page. — I B  [ Poke  ] 18:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Clausgroi, you can't see the problem in your edits because you are not listening to what other editors are saying to you, instead, you keep writing and making the same edits. If you don't want to read loads of text as you say above, don't edit. We work collaboratively on the List of best-selling music artists. I've already told you that inflated and unrealistic sales figures are not used.--Harout72 (talk) 18:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Taylor Swift - my bad
In fact, I went to undo my own edit, but you beat me to it. Sorry about that. Haremhermit (talk) 13:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

AHS
http://popwrapped.com/american-horror-story-season-six-theme/

^There's the reliable source. So can I edit the page now? (Queennnnnnn (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC))
 * No, that is hardly a reliable source without any journalistic or academic credibility. Please read the page WP:RS to understand what qualifies as a reliable source. — I B  [ Poke  ] 14:35, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

A little help
Hey, IndianBio, how you're doing?

I was wondering if you could give me a little help. There's a user that's adding many quotes to his references, and they are not necessary, but his adding everywhere and when they are taken, the user put it back again. I searched on Wikipedia, and I read that they are necessary mainly when an article is from another language or to indicate something in particular, when an article is too extense, for instance, but it's neither the cases. Basically, he put the part that's already in the article and add again to the reference, so I was wondering if you can check them out (they are basically Justin Bieber's articles, such as Cold Water (song), Where Are Ü Now and Love Yourself so far), and I don't think that a good article should have this kind of quotes. I have tried to talk to the user, but he added it back. Thanks, and very soon I'll create another Madonna article. I'll update you! FanofPopMusic (talk) 16:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi FanofPopMusic, okay I will check them. — I B  [ Poke  ] 17:05, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes I checked it, seems unnecessary to go on adding quote for non-challenging content. — I B  [ Poke  ] 17:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's me again. Since you work constantly on the construction of good articles, I need help with the editing on the top of many articles here on Wikipedia, where the same user keeps excluding the lines where I said about the critical reception, always linking the WP:SYN to take them away. You can see on Ariana Grande's Into You article, where it was taken away the part where it's said about the critical reception at the top, and it keeps happening all the time with the same user and other articles (mainly Ariana's and Zayn's). And I know that the good articles here on Wikipedia MUST have a critical consensus about a song and it was never a problem. Until now. I really need help on this. Can you help me? Thanks so much!!!! FanofPopMusic (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I just saw that one of these two editors also took away the critical reception at the top of the Consideration article that I created. Guess it feels like a persecution, because every single good article on Wikipedia can have critical opinion at the top, but the editor keeps using WP:SYNT as an excuse to exclude it. FanofPopMusic (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, please raise a WP:RFC at the talk page and get a consensus on this for once and for all. — I B  [ Poke  ] 15:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Do you think that the Songwriting section needs pruning? Other sections, I believe are now under control. More work on references and prose arrangements and c.e., and this will be as good as "good". FrB.TG (talk) 12:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, the songwriting section is bloated again kind of painting Swift as the writer of Bible or something lol. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jody Watley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Want Your Love. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi there...
Thought you might like to contribute your two-cents worth to | this talk page disscussion. LLArrow (talk) 22:07, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Howdy!
Hey Cedric! I hope all is well with you. Just stopping by to see if you would be interesting in generating some feedback for me over at this featured article candidate. I've spent so much of my time making that article its best and would love to see some constructive criticism! As a fair warning, that you would probably discover anyway, the article did not meet criterion 1e as of a few days ago, but now that the article is stable and free of genre warrior sockpuppets, I am ready to resume any possible input from non-involved users. Thanks so much! If there's anything you ever need, please let me know! Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC).
 * Hey, congrats on nominating the article for FAC, but am afraid if I comment I have to oppose it completely. I can see very much glaring grammar issues with the article, and in terms of prose it is probably not upto the standard desired at FAC1a? criteria. Plus there is an issue as you say from genre warrior sockpuppets so you would need to give it that time to cool down. I would say, go through WP:GOCE/WP:PR and then renominate. — I B  [ Poke  ] 08:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

This is a really short message so not creating a separate section. Do you think we should open a PR for Taylor Swift for further improvement and a possible FAC in the near future? FrB.TG (talk) 11:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , yes I think a WP:GOCE request would benefit the article since we both worked on trimming it and have been developing it, but somewhere I think the flow might have got hampered. A WP:PR or WP:GOCE would benefit with a fresh pair of eyes. — I B  [ Poke  ] 11:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with the flow part. I have now listed it for PR, hoping for thorough reviews from editors. FrB.TG (talk) 11:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which, I've nominated her videography for FL. Care to swing by for a review? FrB.TG (talk) 12:53, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * , I have already that in my to-do list today haha. — I B  [ Poke  ] 12:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of accolades received by Evita (1996 film)
Hello! Your submission of List of accolades received by Evita (1996 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Already taken care of. — I B  [ Poke  ] 15:35, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

scope="row"
Saw your feedback at Featured list candidates/Game of Thrones (season 1)/archive1 about this parameter, and I was looking at a few other television season lists without finding a good example of how this is used optimally in an FL. Can you point me to one that I can emulate for this? Thanks, Jclemens (talk) 00:16, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Responded in the FLC. — I B  [ Poke  ] 13:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Jclemens (talk) 17:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)