User talk:IndianCinemaRasigan

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Baahubali has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Baahubali was changed by ManiRatnamAvargal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959079 on 2015-05-13T08:36:43+00:00.

GA
You seem very passionate about Mani Ratnam's films; ever thought of taking any article of his films to GA status? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:59, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited S. S. Rajamouli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Baahubali
You removed this source which actually seems very useful for the article. Care to explain why? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Account name
If your are not really Mani Ratnam, I suggest you rename your account to avoid being blocked per WP:IMPERSONATE. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I have reported your user name at WP:UAA because after requesting you above you still did not pay attention. Administrators will look into it now. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat  ] 10:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

MY RESPONSE: My username is NOT 'MANI RATNAM', but 'ManiRatnamAvargal'. The Tamil word 'Avargal' makes it a third person reference. If you still insist on a name change, do guide me through the procedure, as I am unsure whether I can manually change it myself.

I would prefer the name to be changed to 'ManiRatnamRasigan'. 'Rasigan' is again a Tamil word, which means 'FAN'. Another option is 'IndianCinemaRasigan'.

Username
This page will help you change your username. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Now that your request – of having a new username – is fulfilled, please remember two things: use only one account, to avoid being blocked per WP:SOCK, and sign all your posts by typing ~ at the end of every post. But you're already a great and honest editor, so happy editing. PS: One day I am sure you'll bring an article to GA status. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The sign should only be on Talk pages right? Should I sign edit summaries? IndianCinemaRasigan 11:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, talk pages only, not edit summaries. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bajrangi Bhaijaan
I wanted to notify that your edit to Bajrangi Bhaijaan has been reverted. In your edit, you did not explain why you were removing "Urdu" form the infobox. Please make use of edit summary in future. I reverted your edit because as the film purports to have been shot in Pakistan, Hindi is not spoken in Pakistan, and so, the language in Pakistan is only Urdu. Faizan (talk) 02:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Production of Baahubali page move
Hi there, you should have opened a discussion and sought consensus before moving Production of Baahubali to Baahubali (film series). Your rationale was The article contains details beyond just production, but if the issue is with the content, the content should be refined to fit the scope of the article, not the other way around. Either way, discussion should have taken place first to allow other interested editors to weigh in. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kirumi (film)


The article Kirumi (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG with no detailed secondary sources, just some promo images and an entry in a website database.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * the thread is Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Production of Baahubali. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Nomination of Kirumi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirumi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kirumi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sanchit Balhara, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian and Romance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Karnan (upcoming film)
 * added a link pointing to Indian


 * R. S. Vimal
 * added a link pointing to Blockbuster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vidyasagar (composer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mozhi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karnan (Malayalam film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prithviraj. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Karnan (Malayalam film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karnan (Malayalam film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karnan (Malayalam film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

WP:UGC
Hi there, per WP:UGC we do not use blogs as references as you did here by supporting content with statements made at filmimovies.com. Anyone with an internet connection can create a blog and proclaim themselves an expert on any subject. There is a world of difference between any-old-source and a reliable published source with an established reputation for fact-checking. I have reverted the changes. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K. S. Gopalakrishnan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarada (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Range of opinion
Hi there, regarding this edit at Kabali (film) where you remove a sourced budget and replace it with another sourced budget, if there is a difference of opinion over budget, wouldn't it be academically responsible to present the range of budget estimates rather than picking the number that closest matches your point of view and settling on that? It would seem to me that ₹70–160 crore would be the intuitive way to present this information, at least until NDTV changes their figures. I'll be changing the content to fit this range. Also, I'm unclear on why you're using studioflicks.com as a reference, as I've previously brought to your attention that we do not use blogs as references. If there's a compelling reason, I'm all ears, but until then I'll be removing the blog. Feel free to reply below. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your signature
I would like to note that per WP:SIGLINK, your signature must contain at least a link to your user page or user talk page. Neither seem to be linked in your signature. nyuszika7h (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Indian film score composers
Please see my proposal to rename/upmerge: Hugo999 (talk) Category:Malayalam film composers to Category:Malayalam film score composers
 * Category:Marathi film music composers to Category:Marathi film score composers

Controversial changes
Hi there, if you intend to make a controversial changes like removing a piece of sourced budget data from an article, as you did at Kabali (film) then you need to open a discussion on the article's talk page to invite discussion. Making a unilateral decision then trying to enforce that decision through silent reverts is just going to make you look like a disruptive editor with an agenda. Even smarter is opening a discussion first, then achieving consensus before the content is removed. I'll point out that the only source you provided of a contrary budget value came from Filmibeat, which I don't believe is generally considered reliable by the WP:ICTF. This even further necessitates the need for discussion rather than reversions and unilateral declarations. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vismayam Mohanlal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vismayam Mohanlal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)