User talk:IndianEditor

India, a Featured Article
Please be aware that in a Featured Article such as India you should discuss a significant edit, especially one that has been challenged, on the talk page first, per WP:OWN. The ASI web site is not a reliable source. Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  11:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Fowler&amp;fowler Are you kidding me

ASI is (Archaeology Survey of India) and what can be bigger source than ASI itself. I am adding it back please don't do edit war. -IndianEditor (talk) 11:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Varna (Hinduism), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   08:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your edit:

Bullshit at first look; not what Kinnard says; not what Buddhism says. Plain bullshit. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   08:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Recently, you removed properly sourced criticism here of a person and a project you have an interest in (you created the article Rally for Rivers), and gave a very poor reason in the edit summary. That's tendentious editing. As for telling editors to create a new page for what car Sadhguru used, I can only say, you don't seem to understand how Wikipedia works. And this, a change you have made repeatedly, suggests you think the information in Wikipedia articles is bound by what the Indian government has declared. I'm sorry, I think you mean well, but you're creating a lot of trouble for other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 14:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: those are just two examples, see also Joshua Jonathan's warning above, and all the other warnings in the history of this page. Bishonen &#124; talk 14:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC).

Unblock Me
Please read my Unblock Request. You without any reason blocked me. IndianEditor (talk) 19:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * IndianEditor, I tried to explain the problems as clearly as I could in the block notice. I'm sorry, but I don't know what else to say. Now that you have posted a request for review of the block, an admin who hasn't had anything to do with you before — not me, and not SpacemanSpiff, but somebody new — will come and review the block. I hope it won't take long. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC).

Unblock Me
IndianEditor (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 13:56, 20 September 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)