User talk:IndianHarryPotter/sandbox

Peer review of IndianHarryPotter's "Air liquid interface cell culture" by Jake bakes
Major points
 * First section doesn't describe two things which seem (to me) to be important: (1) directly compare how this method is different from typical cell culture and (2) why this protocol can and should be used as opposed to others.


 * Protocol steps are very basic, almost too much so to be understandable by someone outside of the field. Perhaps more elaboration on each step would be helpful.


 * "uses" and "adaptive protocol" sections still need to be fleshed out. When writing these sections, keep in mind the focus of the article: what is the importance of this particular protocol in procuring these results.

Minor points
 * tense inconsistency in first sentence, try "basal stem stells are grown with their basal surfaces in contact with media and their top surfaces exposed to air"


 * lots of sudden jargon in second sentence, either elaborate or replace terminology


 * a method can't "aim to be used" itself. Either "scientists aim to use this method to..." or "the [aim/purpose/method] of this method is to..."


 * use consistent capitalization and punctuation in protocol section

Jake bakes (talk) 17:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer review (Hoor)

 * Link “cell culture”, “stem cells”, “epithelium” with existing Wikipedia pages
 * Mention users or importance of this method
 * How does this method compare to other “liquid cell cultures”?
 * Sources for protocol? Check JoVE. Also, I suggest having a schematic that outlines the protocol visually. Purpose of the reagents?
 * “Organs with epithelial cells are isolated (dissected)” — are there certain conditions the organs have to maintain? Or will any organ in any state do?
 * “Isolated organs are chipped finely” — using what device/tool? Manually or by machine? What size?
 * Link SABM to existing Wikipedia article
 * How does a typical sample, after ALI, look like?
 * Change title “Uses in scientific study” to “ALI in Research” or something to that extent that is more professional
 * Add a section of findings from specific studies — maybe include images of their samples?
 * Cite studies and protocol used — Preceding unsigned comment added by HA18C (talk • contribs) 17:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)