User talk:Indian Scientists

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Indian Scientists", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to be that of a group and/or suggests shared usage. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Indian Scientists, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sanjeeva Nayaka has been reverted. Your edit here to Sanjeeva Nayaka was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/lucknowkannadigaru/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

March 2021
Hi Indian Scientists! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Parimelazhagan Thangaraj for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parimelazhagan Thangaraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Parimelazhagan Thangaraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eatcha 09:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Now the sources are updated. The page is re-edited with updated information. Thank you. Indian Scientists (talk) 06:58, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hi Indian Scientists! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Veerambakkam Srinivasan Ramachandran that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)