User talk:IndianaJonas

Speedy deletion nomination of EclipseSource
Hello IndianaJonas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged EclipseSource for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus  talk  19:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

EclipseSource moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, EclipseSource, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Just one question: Are you aware that EclipseSource and Eclipse_Foundation is not the same thing? The citations are mainly from Eclipse_Foundation which according to Wikipedia is "The Eclipse Foundation AISBL is an independent, Europe-based not-for-profit corporation that acts as a steward of the Eclipse open source software development community, with legal jurisdiction in the European Union.[1] It is an organization supported by over 350 members, and represents the world's largest sponsored collection of Open Source projects and developers." 2003:C5:8727:A400:998A:6C48:53A2:A45A (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EclipseSource (May 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EclipseSource and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:EclipseSource Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarcGarver&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EclipseSource reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)