User talk:Indianstar

[Archive1]

[Archive2]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Alternative Alignments.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alternative Alignments.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 00:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for the barnstar. Much appreciated :). I notice that you link to your talk archives on your talk page. You can use a prettier version with archivebox. Take a look at my talk page to see how I've done it. It's right at the beginning. -- vi5in [talk] 20:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Good Suggestion!!. Will do it.--Indianstar (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Adam's Bridge
Sorry for my delayed response to your message on my talk-page. To answer to query: As far as I know Ivarta is a news-compilation-website/web-portal, not known for any high editorial standards ( see "Contributing Opinions, Articles and Content to iVarta.com" at ), and as such is not a reliable source for its original content (of course, we can use it as a convenience link for articles from reliable news agencies such as Rueters, UPI, PTI, TOINS etc). Furthermore as you'll note, the particular article in question carries a prominent disclaimer at the bottom:

which makes it essentially unacceptable as a source on wikipedia. However, if we can verify that the author is a "Former IAS officer who has worked in Tuticorin port and is directly connected with the project" with acknowledged expertise on the topic, it would be ok to cite his writings; although given his COI, we would still need to attribute the statements to him, rather than state them as facts (just as we would do for, say, a statement by a GOI minister). On the other hand, if we cannot confirm  that the author is known for scholarly writings on the topic published by reputable publishers, his article is basically uncitable, although we should feel free to use the ivarta article as a pointer to relevant reliable sources and then cite them directly. I see that you have already taken this approach, which I think is a good idea. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Adam's Bridge
Hi Indianstar,

It feels good to communicate to a fellow wikipedian, who feels so strongly about a topic and wants to see it communicated in the right context.

The reason that I included the statement "This conjecture must be tempered with the fact that there are no geographical pointers to the structure being Rama's Bridge in any of the ancient texts or Puranas" was not to prove or disprove the Rama's Bridge as true or false.

Ramayana is a great epic poem which portrays the story of SriRama, who is the seventh major incarnation of Lord Vishnu. Unfortunately, it does not lend itself to historical or geographical verifications. However, the Mahabharata is more prosaic and contains a wealth of information (astronomical information about position of stars, geographical information for historical verification and the actions of forceful personalities like Bhagavan Parshuram, Kartavirya Arjuna, Shambhara and Ravana). The Mahabharata and Ramayana events occurred in the timespan of 3750 - 3250 BC.

The war which Dasharatha fought, in which he gave the boon to Kaikeyi, was with the asura chief Shambhara whose ally was Ravana. Shambhara's domain was in central India as is stated in the textual prelude of Dasarajna (Battle of Ten Kings). Kartavirya Arjuna ruled over Anupdesh (Gujarat) and wanted to control the maritime activities for which he fought with the Bhrigus (led by Bhargava Parashuram). This is detailed in the contents of various ancient texts.

From the Ramayana stated within the Mahabharata and otherwise, there has been a certain geographical discontinuity about Lanka. Kishkindha which was supposedly in Karnataka, the Sabari story, Panchavati really throw questions on the position of Lanka.

Kubera was the lord of the North (one of the Ashtadikpalas) before the timeperiod of the Ramayana(The Rig Veda). So, Lanka was probably not the 'Srilanka' which we know now as the Lanka and was an island city more up north in the present day 'Arabian Sea' zone or the 'Bay of Bengal' zone. Lanka was a wealthy city because it was the hub of maritime activities due to which Ravana got into a skirmish and was defeated by Kartavirya Arjuna, who was also a strong naval lord. Kartavirya Arjuna's domain never extended beyond peninsular India, throwing another doubt on where Lanka is actually situated.

There are many other ramifications to these statements. I will mail you the list of books from which these points have been made. These books are not by foreign Indologists, but Indians who have tried to authenticate the epics so that stupid statements like the one made by the Government of India can be refuted with scientific clarity

Regards, Magisterkrishna

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Magisterkrishna (talk • contribs) 06:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

OBC&STs&SCs
Hi! Thank you for your good article about OBC!

I am confused with some points, Can you help me?

STs and SCs generally mean Dalits, then what castes does OBC mean?

Does OBC mean the caste between Varna and Dalit? Does OBC point to Jati?

THank you in advance.

Weibin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wangweibin (talk • contribs) 14:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Forward class
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Forward class. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Forward class. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

FC
A vandal named ikonoblast is trying to destroy the FC article. He tried two times (2007 & 2009) to delete it, but his intentions were exposed by other users. See his latest attempt to get the article destroyed here. 122.177.218.88 (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

File:StatewiseFC.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StatewiseFC.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

File:StatewiseBC.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StatewiseBC.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

File:IndianEconomicForecast.xml listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IndianEconomicForecast.xml, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 18:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

File:StatewiseBC.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StatewiseBC.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Tamil அராலி (Araly?) and Tamil யாழ்ப்பாண நகரம் (Jaffna)
The Tamil article http://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/அராலி (Araly?) has no interwiki links to other languages. The Tamil article http://ta.wikipedia.org/wiki/யாழ்ப்பாண_நகரம் is linked to the English article Jaffna. I used the article Tamil script to transliterate the first name. What is the relationship between Araly and Jaffna? -- Wavelength (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alternative Alignments.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Alternative Alignments.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:RacialSlur.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RacialSlur.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 02:58, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Reliance Fresh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reliance Fresh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reliance Fresh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 13:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Alternative Alignments.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Friend, Listen to me Talk a message i Will help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realuser (talk • contribs) 04:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:FCEconomicUrban.jpg


The file File:FCEconomicUrban.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, unclear use/purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 01:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi there
Thamizh aa? Puppet reel (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:IndianEducationSystem.JPG


The file File:IndianEducationSystem.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, replaced with wikitable at Education_in_India."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 03:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)