User talk:Indiefilmreport

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

In particular, removal of templates without addressing the issues and concerns expressed in them is frowned upon. I would appreciate it if you would leave them for other editors to see. Pigman 16:44, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Reliable and Verifiable Sources
The sources you've provided are very poor. Please take a look at Reliable Sources and Verifiability. These will help you judge whether a source is usable to support the information. IMDB is not generally accepted as a primary source on Wikipedia. A fan site is not considered a reliable source for information either. The more I see, the less I'm inclined to think Mr. Ropp meets Wikipedia's standards for notability. Unless better sources can be found, I'm thinking of nominating it for deletion. Pigman 01:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Adam Ropp
An article that you have been involved in editing, Adam Ropp, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Pigman 02:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Removal of AfD notice on Adam Ropp
Removal of the Article for Deletion (AfD) notice on an article is considered vandalism. Please don't remove the notice. When the consensus at the AfD on Adam Ropp is clear, an admin will either remove the notice or delete the article. Thanks for your attention to this established process. Best, Pigman 01:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, AfD Process, Articles for deletion/Adam Ropp
Hi again. Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Please make all comments about the Adam Ropp article at this page: Articles for deletion/Adam Ropp. Bearian 14:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Adam45 (4).jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Adam45 (4).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Adam45 (3).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Adam45 (3).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)