User talk:Indienews

Help request
i made a article about Miner of duty and i can't add any more information since im busy with high school at the moment, there's also a link to it's wiki please and thank you --Indienews (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your article, Miner of duty, is currently being reviewed as a proposed deletion. The reasons are lack of provided context and general notability. To help keep it up you should add more context and details (from a non-biased standpoint). RH - (rosscoolguy) (talk) 19:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I am editing it for spelling, grammar, and layout; but there is only so much I can do. Please consider spending more time on the article if you want it to stay up. I have some helpful links on my user page if you want editing help. Thanks! RH - (rosscoolguy) (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
RH - (rosscoolguy) 13:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
RH - (rosscoolguy) 13:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Help request
help me I tried to post a picture about Miner of duty but i can't figure out who is the copy right holder please Help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indienews (talk • contribs) 17:30, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: new talk page sections always go at the bottom.
 * What is the picture you are trying to upload, please provide a wikilink. -- Patchy1 21:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I cant get a link for the picture but i can give you the website link from there you have to scroll down and you will see the picture that i can't use on here. http://minerofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Miner_of_Duty_Wiki --Indienews (talk) 14:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There are 8 pictures on that page, which one? It doesn't really matter which one, you should be able to use any of those images as fair use using this tag: . -- Patchy1   17:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Indienews. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! 21:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)-- Patchy1

Talkback
― Ross coolguy  19:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a game guide
Please keep in mind when writing about White Noise: A Tale of Horror or any other video game, that Wikipedia is not a game guide. Articles about video games should not read like a game walk through, but should instead limit themselves to high-level descriptions of the general gameplay, and concentrate more on verifiable content such as game reviews, sales or number of online subscribers, etc. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of White Noise: A Tale of Horror


The article White Noise: A Tale of Horror has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable indie game

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
—  nerd fighter  16:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * —  nerd fighter  21:27, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of White Noise: A Tale of Horror for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Noise: A Tale of Horror is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Noise: A Tale of Horror until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  00:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Milkwood
Sorry, I overlooked your message, will respond shortly  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  10:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

OK, multiple problems.

I deleted your article because  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:01, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Nothing about the company (location? staffing? profits/turnover) just unsourced spam.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: made numerous games... make sequels to every sucessful game... company took off... well known... good indie games... trys its best... improved gun textures
 * The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Not a reason for deletion since I didn't need to check

Hi, thanks for message. I'm sorry if I've upset you, but I honestly can't see what I've done to provoke your outburst, other than delete the article. I've apologised for initially missing your post, and posted what to me looks like a perfectly polite and detailed explanation for my actions. I can't see how I've "intimidated" you, or metaphorically kicked you in the groin, or accused you of being a pothead. If you have a specific point that you would like me to address, you need to be clearer about what exactly it is,  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it, your message was positively benign compared to some of the stuff I get. My first two article got deleted, so I know it's no fun. If you need any help, just ask  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:26, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Dismas |(talk) 00:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Videogames, xboxlive, horror, indie games.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Videogames, xboxlive, horror, indie games.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

White Noise: A Tale of Horror
The admin who deleted the article was simply carrying out the consensus of the Article for Deletion discussion. If you think the closure of the AfD was premature, you could (politely) ask him to reopen the AfD, but don't be surprised if he says no. I can put the deleted text in your sandbox, if you want me too, but unless you think that you can solve the notability problems, it will be liable for deletion again. Whilst I understand your interest in these relatively obscure games, it's always going to be difficult to satisfy the notability criteria  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I'll put the text here. I think that the main problems are that most of the text, other than the reception, is unreferenced to independent sources. As I indicated above, if it is difficult to find references, it may be that the game is just not notable enough.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
&mdash;Darkwind (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miner of Duty


The article Miner of Duty has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:VG/RS hits are all cursory mentions. No dedicated articles. Only ref is from an unreliable source. Article topic doesn't pass the search engine test for notability (the GNG).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar  &middot;   &middot;  20:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Miner of Duty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miner of Duty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Miner of Duty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar  &middot;   &middot;  21:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)