User talk:Indivar Bhatia1

Speedy deletion nomination of Shrikant Bharatiya
Hello Indivar Bhatia1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shrikant Bharatiya for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

COI
Thanks for the email. Since you started this page with the account, you have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below.

I started in the sandbox and wanted to make it live could not do it so started another article


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.

I have tried to maintain notability guidelines best to my knowledge also used a templet.

Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Your text was completely unreferenced, with just one link to his own website.

I have given the references of newspapes

I changed all the Marathi text to english.
 * This is English-language Wikipedia, part of your text appears to be in what I think is Marathi.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You said it was a very neutral perspective, but it contains obvious promo like We can call him the go to man to solve any of the farmer  [sic] problems

I removed all promotional looking statements


 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

I have provided two such links

I have not its easier for me to write on MS Word and paste it here cant that be possible ??? or is it not acceptable.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere.

Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I'm not suggesting you necessarily copied any text, since I didn't check

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

You must also reply to the COI request above, since you have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:  Please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shrikant Bharatiya


The article Shrikant Bharatiya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. GSS (talk |c|em ) 16:03, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shrikant Bharatiya


A tag has been placed on Shrikant Bharatiya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom from Paris (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Dom from Paris I am a first time writer and not a coder, with great difficulty I have been trying to write my first article instead of supporting the effort it seems the entire world on wiki is spamming the page. If there is a mistake hlep me learn and write it correctly. How does the article fall in G11 talk Need help not disgrace

Reply
Thanks for email.

You said "I am a first time writer". That isn't true, you posted the same text under the account name User:ItsShrikantbharatiya, and from the start you knew how to use a navbar

You said "I believe this platform can help him reach millions of people worldwide". Wikipedia is not interesting in helping you to advertise his cause, it's an encyclopaedia, not free advertising. On your first user page you were given warnings and guidance about writing an autobiography. I summarise this below.

ou have an obvious conflict of interest, please don't write about yourself, your friends or relatives and read the guidance below:
 * When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

If you are him, you should not be writing about yourself. If you are not him, why were you impersonating him originally.

Instead of trying to follow our rules, you posted the same text, but from a new account, obviously created to make your COI less obvious. Creating sock puppet accounts is not allowed. I am not convinced that if you were unblocked that you won't just post the same stuff again.

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  08:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Jim,
 * Thank you so much for taking time out in explaining where I have gone wrong.
 * I am taking this opportunity to put forward my case and reasons for granting me a second chance on being banned from editing Wikipedia.
 * a. When I said " I am a first time writer...", I meant an author or writer who writes articles. Using navbar is been the similar to using outlook or older versions of gmail so yes I know how to use navbar but I would like to learn more about grammar, tone, and being neutral / impartial in my writings.
 * b. I now understand Conflict of interest and accept that my writings had them, but I hope to improve it, if I have a chance.
 * c. independent verifiable sources  : I will make sure that my next article is well researched before starting it and has enough data (Verifiable  Sources) before submitting it for review.
 * d. Copyrighted text : you wont find any of those in my next one for sure.
 * e. "If you are him, you should not be writing about yourself. If you are not him, why were you impersonating him originally." I was not aware of how Wikipedia worked and did not fully understand the role of editors, and the submission process as I was just too excited to publish whatever I wrote. I took Wikipedia a little too lightly and did not read the do's and don'ts. When ItsShrikantbharatiya got deleted I did not take any action and thought to redo it so being novice I created the same page again in name of Shrikant_Bhartiya I realised then that these two ids have become people instead of being articles, and hence, I created a new account Indivar Bhatia1 and thought of republishing the content without realising the other two ids and this article had the basic problem in the content and what was being written, not having enough source material. This is how all the three were created.
 * I did not read what to do and how to do it, instead was assumed to be "Mr. know it all" thats where it became all wrong.
 * I want to become an editor on Wikipedia and do it right if I get a second chance and delete all these 3 articles as if it never happened and start afresh.
 * I believe you can help me in doing it and I will try not to let you down and promise not to repeat the same mistakes but make newer ones as I evolve in this journey of mine.
 * Sorry for making it so long and thank you for your time and effort in me.
 * Regards
 * IB Indivar Bhatia1 (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You can make an unblock request by copying the following, filling in your reason and saving. You should see a pink box which will soon attract an admin to consoder your request. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  08:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much brother
 * I have submitted my appeal hope its granted and thank you very much for all the time and efforts you have put in helping me
 * Lots of love and wishes
 * Regards
 * IB   Indivar Bhatia1 (talk) 09:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

is closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)


 * . Well I have tried to get a restrain on the block but it did not work. its strange you have learned something new and now you don't have the opportunity to use it.
 * A few topics that are my mind right now are.
 * New Cyber frauds (US) - Prevention
 * Millennial slang (India)
 * Standup comedy (India) Indivar Bhatia1 (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Can Someone please unblock me ??? Indivar Bhatia1 (talk) 08:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)