User talk:Indrek Alberg

Welcome!
Hello, Indrek Alberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570909158 your edit] to Bridging Eastern & Western Psychiatry may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:26, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Leonetto Amadei
Hi Indrek. I have reverted your latest additions to Leonetto Amadei. To me it sounds both as WP:OS and WP:COATRACK. Can you help me understand the direction in which you want to take this biography? Best, Sam Sailor  Sing  07:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC) In my opinion it is noteworthy what now it is actual and it is still topic for the debate. So I should like to stress that today the name of Leonetto Amadei is particularly linked to the decision about plagio (in Latin plagium). Also the participation of the President Amadei at a conference about this controversial point showes his temperament. The comment of Langone is of a scholar of USA, very important in this field of research.

September 2013
Hello, Indrek Alberg. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject. I have no conflict of interest. I am an Estonian student in law, interested in psychological topics.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571091801 your edit] to Leonetto Amadei may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Langone]]in Cultic Studies Journal (1,126 -129 IX) of International Cultic Studies Association ,innthis debate was discussed the whole range of phenomena associated with mental manipulation

Pornophilia
There is only one article about "pornophilia" indexed by PubMed, and it is from 1971. This means that the term gained no support from the scientific community and therefore it should not be employed in Wikipedia articles. Please read WP:MEDRS and WP:MEDASSESS for more information. Tgeorgescu (talk) 12:08, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, I would recommend reading WP:VER and WP:OR, especially WP:SYNTH since it seems that you have produced an original synthesis of the sources you have quoted or otherwise produced information which is not supported by any source. Tgeorgescu (talk) 23:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)