User talk:Ineedhelp15

February 2017
Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ricky Dillon— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 02:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did with this edit to Employment Relations Act 1999. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 02:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Employment Act 2008, you may be blocked from editing. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  02:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Embargo against Northern Cyprus. Materialscientist (talk) 11:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)