User talk:Ineedtoeditthisarticle

Blocked....hard
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

As explained at User talk:Theeditmonster2, I have restored your talk page access so that you can make another unblock request in three months. Note that that is the only reason for restoring talk page access. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l], but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 10:31, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * And, so as per one of your original unblock declines, what is the "compelling reason" why we should unblock you? Have you been editing at other Wikimedia projects, so we can check?  Have you read WP:5P and can recite it by heart?  Does your current unblock request even vaguely match what you're required to have under WP:GAB?  You were not guaranteed to be unblocked in February - you were advised to not come back until February, at which time you needed to convince the community to unblock you at that time ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:57, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * WP:BLANKING states that you may not remove declined unblock requests while sanctions are still in effect. Favonian (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Ineedtoeditthisarticle, see the offer by Beeblebrox dated 25 February: please demonstrate that you're here to contribute constructively by suggesting an article improvement. Max Semenik (talk) 20:26, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * more specifically, let me state that this offer is the only way in which you will be unblocked. Please review the offer; all aspects of it need to be addressed fully.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The reviewing admin should see User talk:IHAVEtoeditthisarticle, especially the comment "As a matter of fact, I have another account doing very constructive edits as we speak (and has been for quite some time), albeit with a far different name than these. I assure you, there will be no disruptive editing on that account. As for these, I should probably feel bad about my year of disruption. I'm sorry you guys have to deal w/ people like me. It looks as though the "i need to edit" legacy comes to an end here, because I am going to leave this in the past, and focus on my other account where good, reliable contributions are made" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * And see User talk:152.30.232.26. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:06, 27 November 2012 (UTC)


 * We don't unblock annoyances, we double down on their blocks. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 03:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note to reviewing admin: Most recent vandalizing sock from this user is User:HuahHeahHuahHahA-Huah, created 2-Dec-2012. --jpgordon:==( o ) 03:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Something to note: It appears as though that double-down hasn't completely worked (unstoppable), and I would never dream of doing something to harm the system of another computer (I know the servers of Wikipedia are computers, and that deleting pages is considered 'harming' them.  I am speaking colloquially). I'm not doing this to cause harm to people; I'm just doing it to get this account back

I can still talk here. This is my talk page, and I'llllll be a'postin tha messages here. Looks like the double-down was ineffective. I guess you'll have to unblock me now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Can'tstopthakrunkmachine (talk • contribs) 05:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtoeditthisarticle for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 04:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC)