User talk:Inexorable Existence

Timestamps
Hi there. I'm contacting you here as discussing things in edit summaries only gets you so far. Our disagreement about timestamps at Davy Klaassen is another example of that. ;-)

My understanding of how to use timestamps is based on long-established WP:FOOTY consensus which fellow editor "FkpCascais" refers to in this discussion: "This issue has been setled long time ago. It was decided the timestamp would indicate that the stats are correct as to the date, rather than indicating the date of the last game. Once this was decided, updating a timestamp with correct stats is allways beneficial. Having an old timestamp is unproductive as it leaves readers wandering if stats may have changed by now." Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * I don't agree with this but fair enough go ahead and change it back then if there has been a consensus. Inexorable Existence (talk) 09:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Davy Klaassen again – quoted attributes
Hi there. Thanks for fixing the incorrect totals at Davy Klaassen. Please don't remove the quotes for HTML attributes. In many cases, they are not necessary but they are definitely recommended. See:
 * https://www.w3schools.com/html/html_attributes.asp: "The HTML standard does not require quotes around attribute values. However, W3C recommends quotes in HTML, and demands quotes for stricter document types like XHTML."
 * HTML attribute: […] "The value may be enclosed in single or double quotes, although values consisting of certain characters can be left unquoted in HTML (but not XHTML). Leaving attribute values unquoted is considered unsafe."

Actually, for a while I myself habitually removed the quotes because it looked "cleaner" to me until another football contributor here pointed out the above to me. Kind regards, 18:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Angel Gomes
Check the article talk page. I know what the term "free agent" means, but that article is written in British English and the term "free agent" is not typically used in British English. Players are far more commonly referred to as being "unattached" or having been "released". "Free agent" is extremely uncommon and is an example of a creeping Americanism. – PeeJay 19:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeff Hendrick
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jeff Hendrick you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 10:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeff Hendrick
The article Jeff Hendrick you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jeff Hendrick for issues which need to be addressed. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 12:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeff Hendrick
The article Jeff Hendrick you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jeff Hendrick for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 12:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Gary Lineker
Great. Please leave an Edit summary when making changes. Britmax (talk) 12:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Nikki Duff" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nikki_Duff&redirect=no Nikki Duff] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

"Miriam O'Reilly (Fair City)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miriam_O%27Reilly_(Fair_City)&redirect=no Miriam O'Reilly (Fair City)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

"James Oakley (Fair City)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Oakley_(Fair_City)&redirect=no James Oakley (Fair City)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

"Jake Martin (Fair City)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jake_Martin_(Fair_City)&redirect=no Jake Martin (Fair City)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)