User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 21

Concern regarding Draft:Template:A Quiet Place
Hello, InfiniteNexus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:A Quiet Place, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2023 UFO sightings


Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 UFO sightings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

True to the Text
Can someone please make the links "G'iah (Marvel Cinematic Universe)" and "Varra (Marvel Cinematic Universe)" because then it wouldn't undercut the character biographies between original comic and MCU versions as well as people like you instantly changing what I did thirty minutes in one keystroke. 13 August 2023 - 69.121.183.150 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.183.150 (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Gonnym and I have explained in detail to you why the undisambiguated redirects should point to the MCU versions and why MCU-disambiguated redirects are not needed. Readers can still find information about the comics characters via hatnotes on the MCU characters list. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:58, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

"E.g."
There very, very often is a comma after e.g. Either style is permissible so it generally should not be changed willy-nilly per MOS:STYLEVAR. That's just inviting a "style war", especially if you do nothing but that kind of WP:MEATBOT change of removing the comma without doing anything genuinely constructive in the article. It triggers people's watchlists and is apt to irritate them, for no objectively defensible reason. Just a word to the wise. (I actually usually prefer it without the comma myself, but it really depends on the sentence structure.) PS: I've seen some writers (mostly on self-published style blogs and user-written Web forums) claim that a comma after e.g. or i.e. "is American" and that lack of one "is British", but there is no published actual data to back up such a claim that I've ever been able to find. Thus a MOS:ENGVAR-based rationale for going around changing it en masse is not likely to fly. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I was reverting an edit, not making it. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Your recent editing history at Talk:Rebel Moon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Linkin Prankster (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, it has become clear to me that there is a WP:CIR issue here. For the record, I reverted twice — in accordance with policy. (Also, there's a WP:DTTR template at the top of the page ...) InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You don't have to revert four or even three times. If your behaviour is suspicious for intent on continuing edit war then you can be warned. I won't revert again either anyway. Linkin Prankster (talk) 07:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah ... no. I stopped reverting once it became clear you wouldn't stop and that there were CIR issues. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't know whether you're going to revert again or not within a few minutes of you revrting a second time and me warning you. You stated that you didn't intend on reverting again only after my warning. Linkin Prankster (talk) 09:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ihave started a move proposal to seek a consensus, hope there's no problem in it. Linkin Prankster (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

I have an alternate proposal. Let's remove the Part One: A Child on Fire title as an alternative title for Rebel Moon and make the article about both films/parts for now. After all the second film is just a plain continuation written together and was even shot back-to-back. If the second part warrants its own article after release, we can separate it from Rebel Moon like Dune and Dune: Part Two. Linkin Prankster (talk) 07:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That would be a highly unconventional arrangement that would require substantial discussion among the article's editors. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pixelbook (2nd generation)


Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pixelbook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:A Quiet Place


Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:A Quiet Place".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, InfiniteNexus. Thank you for your work on Potential acquisition of Disney by Apple. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails  Wx  13:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi InfiniteNexus, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:07, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:10, 11 September 2023 (UTC)