User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 24

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Clarification
In light of what is currently occurring on the page I feel I must clarify that this edit is not meant to be sarcastic, that is actually a great idea and I didn't know that page existed. Not sure what is going on there now but will be disengaging until such a time as I figure out what that dude is playing at. Thank you Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 23:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There is way to much sarcasm on that talk page, that's for sure. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 23:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No matter who you agree with, please stop. If you were being sarcastic, you are being WP:POINTy. If you were being genuine, then your comments are really bizarre, and I would suspect WP:CIR issues. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I think you're bordering on indirect WP:PA here, so I'm suggesting you don't go much further with your current line of inquiry to avoid any further insults (that may have already been caused). I wasn't being sarcastic, so not pointyness. I was being genuine that I thought @Horse Eye's Back was suddenly 100% correct about everything, and therefore this insults said user's WP:CIR to say otherwise. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for clarifying. I too am baffled at what the other user is trying to do. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe try & put an end to a dead-end discussion? Looks like it worked. WP:SARC CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I kept trying to figure out why that had turned into such a confusing brawl and the more I look at it the more I think that CommunityNotesContributor was *never* editing in good faith and they were messing with people from the beginning (they wrote the convoluted and contradictory OPs in both discussions) and kept poking and prodding at each junction to make the fire burn brighter and hotter. I've never had a discussion go as bad as the one around Twitter has gone in my whole wikipedia career, only in hindsight do I realize that perhaps that wasn't by accident. I apologize for getting frustrated with you, this was probably a discussion I should have avoided. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 15:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read projection, as you're now blaming me for your WP:TENDENTIOUS editing. You believe . The only way to seemingly end the pointless bickering was for me to change my opinion - which I'm entitled to do and appears to have worked for now - over your WP:DISRUPTIVE editing that quickly turned into WP:NOTGETTINGIT. It was obvious you were never going to WP:LISTEN, so I thought I might as well just agree with you instead. "If you can't beat em join em".
 * I have no doubt this raises questions about my WP:COMPETENCE, and rightly so, as I easily give up arguing in pointless discussions, and therefore my opinion shouldn't be trusted in arguments where a user is consistently being disruptive and not actively listening to anyone.
 * I was always clear from the start that I supported Option D, however at no point did I support a split prior to consensus being reached. I even made it clear I felt it lacked notable support, so please do not misrepresent my opinions on the matter. Is it possible the reason you've never had a discussion go as bad as this is because you've never engaged in such a controversial and contentious split??
 * But of course, you are almost never wrong. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * So, you were being sarcastic. This is not appropriate and even more disruptive than Horse Eye's wikilawyering. I too disagree with them, but you don't see me being sarcastic or needlessly dramatic. Please stop doing this and take the steps necessary to remedy your actions, starting with the removal of this POINTy message on your user page. If this behavior persists, I will have to involve an administrator. (Pinging so they are aware of this discussion.) InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I wasn't being sarcastic, that's not what I said. I'll often change my opinion for the benefit of consensus, or lack of, as a compromise, no matter how daft that may be, for the benefit or progress. Hence my opinion on these types of disputes shouldn't neseccarily be considered reliable. Whether you understand that principle of mine or not I can't help you with.
 * I'm not interesting in further disputes, I'm happy to leave the discussions on Twitter/History of Twitter regarding splitting, because they've quite frankly been derailed and turned into a mess. I don't want to waste my time or others with that. So sure, I'll stop commenting there. I apologise given you found my comments disruptive, I shouldn't have commented as much as I did.
 * I very much hope you're not suggesting I remove the message on my user page, otherwise you will involve an administrator. This would be a coercive threat if so; trying to get me to make an edit, and threatening to involve an admin if I don't. I'll assume good faith that this isn't what you meant, and simply that you don't want me to be disruptive any further which I already agreed to.
 * If you feel the need to involve an admin, please do so. I feel that the behaviour of all editors involved could do with scrutiny, some more than others. Threatening to involve an admin is fine, but threats with the intent of coercion are not. If an admin believes the opinions expressed on my user page are inappropriate I'll remove them, but not because someone is trying to coerce me into that. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 21:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You didn't just "change your opinion". You made comments such as and  And then you repeatedly made unconstructive interjections such as  and . InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That settles it then. I was disruptive, I acknowledge that, and already apologised. Thanks for understanding. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 23:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Ouroboros
Ops, I'm sorry, it was indeed a mistake. I translated that part of the page and then imported it into itwiki, but for an error, I also published it here

Anyway, shouldn’t Ouroboros "O.B." be changed in Ouroboros "O.B."? Redjedi23 (talk) 19:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries. I don't think it's necessary to un-bold the quotation marks, but I'm not sure if there are any guidelines that say so. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh ok, I said that for consistency with the Characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe: A-L article Redjedi23 (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hmm, interesting. I wasn't aware that we were un-bolding the quotation marks elsewhere in the article. In that case, it doesn't hurt to be consistent within the article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Punctuation
In case you haven't already got Talk:Crazy,_Stupid,_Love on your watchlist and did not see my message that I had brought the question to WP:FILM then please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film -- 109.77.196.243 (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the notice. WT:FILM is on my watchlist, so I did see your post. I will respond there momentarily. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you!! InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Rebel Moon
As you've stopped replying I'll be seeking a consensus a while after the movie is released (I think a month or so is a good idea). I hope you have no problem. Linkin Prankster (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, hopefully by then, the copyright listing or a billing block will have emerged. The reason I don't think we should jump the gun is that if the official title does not include the subtitle, including it here would be an unnecessary disambiguation. The same thing happened with Dune (2021 film) and It (2017 film), where the films billed themselves as "Part One" but didn't actually include subtitles in their official titles. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Move to Mainspace:Letty Ortiz
Hey User:InfiniteNexus, I added reliable premiary NYT secondary sources, thus I requesting you for merging Draft:Letty Ortiz-Letty Ortiz or move to main space, thanks. QalasQalas (talk) 01:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * You have already submitted the draft to AfC; please wait for a reviewer to review it. This process may take from anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, so please be patient. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)