User talk:Infinitoperu

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

"...on a platform that includes an intent to issue a pardon to her father"

that is false!! it´s a speculation

I am increasing important information for the public, personal information of Keiko

November 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC) The information is not the problem, you are breaking Wikilinks, removing images and writing unencyclopedically-please post on the talkpage.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I have realized the translation of the biography updated of Keiko Fujimori. This information came to a consensus in the version in Spanish. Many versions and links exist with political premeditation, specially when they include links of his father Alberto Fujimori.

--Infinitoperu (talk) 21:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Please do not revert again, as you'll have to be reported for breaking the three revert rule, of which you've been informed.
 * The information you're adding seems fine. Just try and fix the problems. Good luck. SamEV (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Mira, te estamos tratando de explicar que si no desistes, te pueden bloquear de este sitio. No podrás contribuir a esta enciclopedia por algún tiempo.

No nos oponemos a la información en si, sino a la forma en que la has presentado y los cambios que has hecho.

Ya has revertido 4 veces, pero aquí te va otra oportunidad de que evites una sanción. Si reviertes de nuevo, serás reportado ahí: Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. SamEV (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There's a discussion about this at the BLP Noticeboard.Anythingyouwant (talk) 04:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 16:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Your block has already expired. There was no need to request unblocking. I removed the unblock request template you placed on User talk:Cirt. May I provide any further assistance? Jehochman Talk 16:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Jehochman, We need someone in wikipedia that evaluate the information of "Keiko Fujimori", because the other users(political users) try to delete the real and actually information, the same of spanish version. --Infinitoperu (talk) 17:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Keiko Fujimori
Please, engage in discussion, at the article's talk page, on Talk:Keiko Fujimori. -- Cirt (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of One week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I blocked again without evaluating the information added, please evaluate the case, is an abuse of authority. Mr. Cirt (the person who blocked me) has not reviewed the information. --Infinitoperu (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You received multiple warnings, and yet continued the exact same behavior pattern. You were blocked, and yet continued the same behavior, at the exact same article. You were told to engage in discussion at the article's talk page, but you did not - and instead repeated the same disruptive behavior at a WP:BLP page. -- Cirt (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. You must follow wikipedia policy, and you must pay attention to legitimate warnings, as defined in the English wikipedia if you wish to edit here. Cirt is correct in his action. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)