User talk:Infinity128

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fire Kills (September 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fire Kills and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fire Kills, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fire_Kills Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fire_Kills reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Rhythm of the Rain has been reverted. Your edit here to Rhythm of the Rain was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://pif.fandom.com/wiki/Friends_of_the_Earth_-_Acid_Rain_(1990;_UK)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fire Kills
Hello, Infinity128. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fire Kills, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fire Kills


Hello, Infinity128. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fire Kills".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ambiamory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ambiamory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ambiamory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Crossroads -talk- 23:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Article creation
Hi Infinity128, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I've seen your recent article creations and although they are well made, I don't think they meet our notability guidelines, which requires articles on Wikipedia to have 2-3 reliable sources providing significant coverage to the subject. Specifically, Invidious and Piped likely cannot be created because of this guideline. I've re-redirected the articles for now. If you have any questions, or have sources proving the notability of the articles, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or ping me following the instructions on WP:MENTION.  Just ' i ' yaya  02:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Lately, I have been finding many aspects of the internet quite hostile (not just Wikipedia). What if I undo the blanking and add the sources? Will the articles remain written, or will I be breaking some other untold Wikipedia guideline and have them removed again?

I'm Infinity128, thank you for coming to my TED talk. 11:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry if I made the internet a bit more hostile with the blank and all...
 * An undo is possible, you can restore a blank and redirect without breaking any guidelines. The articles will remain there but if the issues are not addressed they can still be nominated for deletion.
 * What sources do you plan to add in order to prove notability? Usually every subject requires at least 2 reliable, secondary sources providing significant coverage in order to be notable so that an article can be created.  Just ' i ' yaya  11:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

I haven't really started looking yet. However, I know for sure that Invidious will have a good amount of coverage. Piped might be a little harder to find, but I should be able to do something.

Thanks for explaining that, and I suppose a blank is better than nomination for deletion by a long shot. In a way, thank you.

I'm Infinity128, thank you for coming to my TED talk. 12:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Okay, good luck on that. Feel free to ping me if you want someone to check your sources.  Just ' i ' yaya  12:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've added some more secondary and tertiary sources to Invidious, as well as neatening up the sources under the "Version history" section and updating the latest version (if this could be automated, please tell me how).
 * Here is the source code: https://privatebin.net/?7ed730581cd04d56#Gg8ecj35pYVYx12H6TPVwawwiaTxLKz8k5t2GfQp8HwT
 * And here is a list of the sources: https://privatebin.net/?384c6fb08f0eda2d#AtNUKG6Bjn44igVYn4U8fvaDx4xbbhegXBMutFkxGf7d
 * The page now has a ratio of eight primary sources and four secondary sources. Hopefully, this is enough. I have not published the page just yet.
 * I'm Infinity128, thank you for coming to my TED talk. 13:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Primary sources usually does not count toward WP:GNG, listed secondary sources (on above links) and my analysis are below:
 * makeuseof.com (archive link) - reliability seems questionable
 * alternativeto (also this) - Likely not significant in terms of coverage, usually we need one or two paragraphs
 * desdelinux - appears to be self published (considered reliable in rare circumstances)
 * At the moment I don't think the subject is notable. Feel free to ask someone else to review the sources if you disagree with my analysis.  Just ' i ' yaya  14:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Invidious for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Invidious, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Invidious until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Yattee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yattee, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Yattee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)