User talk:InfoBoss

Ferrari-boyz
Hi, thanks for the email.

I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the music notability guidelines. The fact that the performers are notable doesn't automatically transfer to everything they do. Since the album has not been released, it is difficult to see how it can meet the criteria. The article has no content that even claims notability &mdash; there's just a tracklist (trivial information) and a release date. The proposed release can be incorporated into the performers' articles. It may become notable, it isn't yet.

The primary purpose of the deleted article appears to be to advertise the album. Please see this information. The only information you give is a tracklist and a release date. The "references" are a sales site, and a review linking to an i-Tunes download from a site which does not appear to meet the definition of an independent verifiable source

Just one other point, not connected with the deletion. Another editor had commented on you using bare urls as references. You can make the refs more intelligible by using this format  [url description]  So  Women's World Cup on the BBC  appears as Women's World Cup on the BBC instead of http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14168601.stm

Hope this helps  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:08, 18 July 2011 (UTC)