User talk:InfoTrip

New Chronology
The information is sourced - I don't understand how you missed it. Anyway, read WP:LEAD. Sources need to exist, but not necessarily in the lead. Doug Weller talk 14:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

What are the exact sources (works and page numbers) for "The theory further proposes that world history prior to 1600 AD has been widely falsified to suit the interests of a number of different conspirators including the Vatican, the Holy Roman Empire, and the Russian House of Romanov, all working to obscure the "true" history of the world centered around a global empire called the "Russian Horde"."? InfoTrip (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to New chronology (Fomenko). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''Specifically "However, Fomenko himself claims the exact opposite on page 196 of his 1994 publication "Empirico-Statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and its Applications to Historical Dating." The claim that Fomenko's New Chronology is not a conspiracy is supported, meanwhile the claims that it is have yet to be backed by any reference to New Chronology literature." (you'd also need a secondary source for what Fomenko says) and ", but the seven volume series shows that the Old Testament and the New Testament were created in a more-so contemporary fashion rather than one before the other. "'' Doug Weller  talk 19:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)