User talk:Infoblogger

Speedy deletion nomination of Weno Sports


A tag has been placed on Weno Sports requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. X X X antiuser 20:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Weno Sports
A tag has been placed on Weno Sports, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RWJP (talk) 20:38, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Weno Sports. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. removing the template with an edit summary that was untrue earned you a level 2 warning, instead of a level 1 Wuh  Wuz  Dat  20:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wuh Wuz  Dat  20:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, your article needs to be neutral, encyclopaedic and have verifiable independent sources for any claims. There must also be references to show why the company is notable enough to have an article. The fact that it took you ages to find it, suggests it is not notable, esp as no website even is given This is the perfect example of a company article -  I wouldn't expect that, but you do need to adjust the style and put in sources if you recreate  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  07:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Bolding the company name throughout is spammy, just first occurrence should be bold
 * EPAP why like
 * nationwide, I assume this is US and NC is North Carolina - this is a global encyclopaedia
 * evidence that percentages of the entry fees going to various charities
 * TENNIS, SOFTBALL, SOCCER, FLAG FOOTBALL, 3 ON 3 BASKETBALL, KICKBALL, VOLLEYBALL why bold and capitals?
 * The athletes on staff are highly specialized in their particular sports and make themselves available for individual lessons and athletic performance consultations.  need an independent source for the claim of their skills