User talk:Inform&clarify

Dubious edits on Malaysian Maverick

 * Hey user:Infrom&clarify, I just wanted to stop by to note a couple of things. I understand you are a relatively new editor, so I just wanted to remind you of a couple of things. ::First, Wikipedia is in no way space for your personal opinions. While a lot of the article ([Malaysian Maverick]) is fine, there are a couple of statements you added which raise some eyebrows. You added in the article:

"Do not simply rely on claims made on the Wikipedia which contains no references and which did not even cite a single page number in this popular and controversial biography written by a vital and adventurous investigative journalist" This is not only your opinion, but it is unacceptable to add. If you want the article to cite more sources, then do so, but any note like this is unacceptable.


 * Second: I would like to just note according to WP:RS, Goodreads is not a reliable source. Hence, you can not open (or even include), a quote from them. If you are ever wondering about the reliability of a source, just go a check WP:RS, its a great practice.


 * Finally: I was just wondering why you removed the controversy's in the article. Especially, the one from TIME Magazine, seeing as it is considered under WP:RS to be very sound.

Thank you very much for all your hard work, and I look forward to your response. Have a wonderful day!! -Willthehelpfuleditor (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I've followed up on this by removing your plot expansions and original research on the article, don't include your novel analysis on articles. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 18:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Children's Health Defense article
user:Infrom&clarify, your repeated changes to the lead of this article are not constructive and go against the sources listed. If you need to have a discussion about how it's written, use the article's Talk page. Bring credible sources. Robincantin (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)