User talk:InformationCheck

January 2020
Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed there are several birth dates given for this comedian in several articles. I think it is better to keep the subject clear until we can be completely sure of the information we are providing. Many thanks. InformationCheck (talk) 08:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, InformationCheck. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 08:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I have no external relationship to the subjects I have written about. I am aware of the work they do, that is all. Most importantly I think the information provided by Wikipedia should be as correct and accurate as possible, quite often unsolicited websites are cited or contradictory information is published. Many thanks InformationCheck (talk) 08:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Natasia Demetriou Age
PLease go to her talk page if you disagree with her age. The only reliable source I could find that gave her rough age was "Jamie and Natasia Demetriou: 'Our spirit animal is a Muppet with its mouth open'" in the i newspaper on the 6th September 2019 it says "Jamie Demetriou was two years old during the Christmas of 1989, when his sister, Natasia, then five, supposedly lent into his pram for a pep talk about “really championing each other’s work”. Thus 1984 (age 5) She studied acting at Leeds University. . Do you know better

April 2020
Your recent editing history at Natasia Demetriou shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Grey joy talk 09:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Natasia Demetriou Age and Birth Again
Wikipedia has a strict inclusion policy that demands that all statements must be backed up by sourced material. All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative published (secondary i.e. independent) sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is about a living person. Whatever your relationship or personal knowledge of the subject are, they are irrelevant, an editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong on Wikipedia.

The age in this article is supported by a reliable source, if want to change it, you must provide a source as least as good as the current one. Until such time you can provide a better source to back up your repeated changes to that article your unsupported changes will be treated as vandalism. ~ BOD ~ TALK 12:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)