User talk:Infosim

August 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Infosim


A tag has been placed on Draft:Infosim, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Infosim/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Infosim/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:35, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Obviously not, at least not WP:USERNAME WP:PROMO WP:PAID WP:COI WP:V WP:NOSHARE. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear Yunshui, thank you very much for the quick and very helpful answer! Points 1 and 2 in your bullet list are very clear to us. Please allow just one clarifycation question regarding the 3rd and 4th point. Does this mean that none of the existing company and product articles in Wikipedia have been created by the company themselves (point 3) or anyone paid by the company (point 4) or is there still a valid, "legal" way of letting a neutral article being created by the company itself or by a person paid to do so? We are quite sure that we have seen other Wikipedia articles that as a matter of fact have been created by the companies/product vendors themselves. Thanks in advance for your help! PS: regarding point 5 and your final comment: we are definitely more than willing to also contribute to other Wikipedia articles about topics that touch our subject matter expertise in order to let everyone benefit of this. So, we do explicitly not just want to write about our own organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infosim (talk • contribs)
 * I hope you don't mind, but i dropped your question out of the "unblock request" template. If you keep adding unblock requests that do not directly address the problems, you will eventually have this page locked - best to just ask questions like this normally. You question about points 3 and 4 are immaterial to the request; poor behavior by others is not an excuse. We're looking for you to address each item specifically, including proposing a new username and limiting this account to one user. Kuru   (talk)  14:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)