User talk:Infozub

December 2014
Hello, I'm Bonadea. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Andrew Charalambous without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 14:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Charalambous, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. ''

Since you are evidently affiliated with Mr Charalambous (per this edit), you need to be extra careful when you edit Wikipedia articles about him. Please see Wikipedia's guidelines about editing with a conflict of interest. Instead of removing sourced content yet again, please discuss on the article's talk page, and do not edit until you have a consensus in favour of the edits. Thank you. bonadea'' contributions talk 15:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Charalambous
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you removed content from the article on Andrew Charalambous. First, let me note that if you are Andrew Charalambous, or are closely related to him (for example, work for his campaign), you should not be editing the article. This is a violation of Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest editing, and should not occur. Second, I wanted to let you know that I restored the material you deleted. Wikipedia has a policy of neutral reporting of what is covered in reliable sources. In this case, a newspaper has found his credentials to be lacking. This should be reported. Of issue, it would seem, are not the existence of the certificates, but the authority of the issuing body. These are eminently important and relevant to the claim of a degree and professorship. I would invite you to discuss the matter on the article's talk page before removing content again (and you should disclose any conflicts of interest before participating). --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Infozub, Username
I just noticed your username is the same as an SEO company based in India. Please note all users must register individually, not as a company, promotional usernames are not permitted, and you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia on behalf of clients. For this reason, I have blocked you account and its associated IP addresses. If you have concerns about this, please note it below. If you wish to be unblocked, please add below, describing the reason you want to be unblocked. --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)