User talk:Inframek/Parity (raw materials economics)

I regard raw materials economics as being a set of economic relationships as provable as any mathematics and not subject to various opinions regarding economic theory. However, those who know little of raw materials economics seem sensitized to near religious beliefs regarding one economic theory or another. While Marxist and other schools of economics refer back to the basic economic principles of raw materials economics that does not make raw materials economics part of any school of economic theory. Raw materials economics reinforces the truism that there is no free lunch and nothing more regarding the political ramifications of any given economic theory.

How best to express this appears to require unusual writing ability, as sensitive trigger words abound in any discussion of economics. All my previous attempts to include a discussion of raw material economics in other areas of Wikipedia have been removed for one pejorative reason or another. I wish to avoid that fate for a raw materials economics entry.

Please advise.

Update: Oh, never mind. Seems I cannot even keep a draft page for parity much less raw materials economics alive around here.

Inframek (talk) 02:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)