User talk:IngerAlHaosului/Archive

This is my talk page archive DON'T edit

User_talk:IngerAlHaosului/Archive/Current

 Archive 2008 

Sorry
Oops, I was a bit unclear, wasn't I? According to the merging and summarising policies, when you split out parts of one article into another article (or merge bits of one article into another), you're supposed to link the old article in your edit summary so that it's easy for people to track the history of the words. Doing this helps with the legal side of things at Wikipedia, by helping us comply with the GFDL license about attribution. Because you forgot to do that in your initial edit, I was just (trying to) make a note of it on the talk page to assist anyone who wants to know where the text came from. I don't want to merge the page back into the main Rosario + Vampire article.-Malkinann (talk) 07:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Old Turkic Script
Hi. I was working on the images from commons rather than the English wikipedia. I replaced the there and tagged the images. If the tags remain here then they must have been double tagged since templates from commons are included here in image descriptions. If it's on commons, best to tag it there to avoid duplication. I'll go find the remaining duplicates. —  ₪₪  ch1902   ₪₪  11:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Romanian poets
Perhaps you could help expand some of the Romanian poets I have been adding. Know User:Dahn?? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 16:07, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Racoviţa, Sibiu
Salutare, sunt ro:utilizator:asybaris01 si am dezvoltat un articol monografic despre satul meu natal Racoviţa, Sibiu. Acest articol a obtinut statutul de articol de calitate pe wikipedia romaneasca. Daca veti avea amabilitatea de a-l citi sau macar de a-l vizualiza veti vedea amploarea lui, precum si bogatia de informatii existente in articolele adiacente. Dupa parerea mea si a altora este un produs de export cultural pentru Romania. Am inceput demersurile de cauta traducatori specializati pentru promovarea lui in alte limbi de circulatie internationala. V-as fi recunoscator daca v-ati exprima parerea despre el si mai ales daca timpul va permite sa participati la publicarea lui in limba engleza.Asybaris01 (talk) 14:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Lilly Maxwell
Hello Inger,

Did you contribute the following passage to the Wikipedia page on Woman's sufferage in the UK?

"Lily Maxwell was the first women to vote in Britain in 1867 after the Great Reform Act of 1832 that explicitly excluded all women from the voting register by deliberately using the term "male" rather than "person". Before this, a very small number of wealthy women were able to vote. Maxwell, a shop owner, met the property qualifications required to become eligible for the vote and her name was accidentally added to the election register; this was used for great publicity by the women's suffrage campaigners at the time. Women's voting was later declared illegal."

If you did can I firstly suggest the first sentence be altered to:-

In 1867 Lily Maxwell was the first women to vote in Britain after the Great Reform Act of 1832

Just to make it clearer if indeed 1867 was the year Lily Maxwell voted.

It is this sentence however that really prompts me to write.

"Before this, a very small number of wealthy women were able to vote."

Can you cite any examples? I actually only know of one - in 1554! - and the circumstances were quite exceptional.

I do not think it was ever an intention of the 1832 Reform Act to disenfranchise woman - because I'm quite convinced that no one at the time thought any were enfranchised.

I'm prepared to be corrected.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Buttle

Keswick, England

buttlekeswick@hotmail.com

217.155.193.205 (talk) 08:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Reply to e-mail 2
Thanks for the reply. As I also said to the other translators above, I need the Wikimedia Foundation's donation form translated into Romanian (Română). The existing translation hasn't been updated since 2006. :-( If you are willing to help, the source and workspace can be found on Meta-Wiki: Donate/ro.  Thanks again for your help with this, I appreciate it.  Cbrown1023    talk   14:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Google Chrome
It was tagged for non-controversial housekeeping deletion (CSD G6) by User:SHARD. Perhaps you should ask him about the specific circumstances.  bibliomaniac 1  5  17:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Best speedy ever
Woohoo - Tbsdy lives (talk) 12:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Google Chrome Version Deletion
Yes, it was deleted because Google Chrome does not yet have a stable release. Basically any "beta" or "alpha", etc, release of a program should be placed under the "preview release" tag, as it is not a complete and stable program mostly free of bugs. By calling it "beta" Google is saying that there may be major bugs in the program and thus it shouldn't be considered "stable". We follow suit and consider the release a "preview" release. When Google decides to remove the "beta" tag, we can consider it "stable". So whenever they do that, feel free to recreate the stable release page. Thanks for asking! -sHARD (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

 Archive 2009 

Help with image for deletion category
helpme
 * Hello, if you have a question, please post it along with a new helpme tag. Thanks! Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

helpme I have come across a category that has been deleted as empty but contains multiple file marked for deletion Category:All images with a rationale but unknown copyright status i don't know what to do in such a case so i tried to contact a admin to delete the images and to fix the template so it doesn't add any more images to the category.


 * The category has since been restored by . Thanks for letting us know. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 20:11, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

helpme The parent category of this category report 0 content but there are in fact 340 files that are marked for sd but are not as of yet deleted some are even marked as delete after 7 January, can a admin take care of this.And by take care i i am referring to the deletion of the files.
 * It appears that you're looking at Category:Images with a rationale but unknown copyright status - the "0" there is the number of subcategories "down" the tree from the category that is numbered, not the number of images in that sub-category.  Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

speedies
Hey, thanks for catching those images like File:Silvanamissearthznla3vy7.jpg, I'm trying to delete them. I'm actually deleting them under F9, since they're technically supposed to have been tagged for a week before deleting if you go by F5. But if they're copyright violations, I need to know where they came from. I can't find it for File:Silvanamissearthznla3vy7.jpg, do you know where it's from? Thanks again for your tagging work! Peace, delldot   &nabla;.  22:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, F5 technically isn't correct, because they haven't been tagged as orphaned for a week. I've been deleting the ones you tagged as F9 because they're all pretty obvious copyvios so far--but I'm only able to do that when I can figure out the source they're copied from.  Thanks for the link to the PUI page, I'll close the ones there that I can.  I should have noticed that in the first place.  (No need to tag PUI listed images that are waiting to get closed, someone will come along and close them eventually).  Peace,  delldot   &nabla;.  22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Email
Hi there. I just sent you an email. Amsaim (talk) 10:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates
Please, i know this request is not related to wikipedia but i am desperate and i dont know who to ask. If any one with template knowledge can help please to so.Here is the template i don't understand why the loop happens. So please
 * I think because you put in the template, but I'm not sure. Sole Soul (talk) 09:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Commons helper helper is broken T_T
Please help me, after a user name change a important script stop working i already asked the author but got no response.Below i include the request and instructions.IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * After your name change the script doesn't work any more, i tracked the error to a single line of code  in this page User:Fran Rogers/CH2 en.js.As the the page http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Krimpet/CH2.js is imported in raw form, instead of getting the script all you get is #REDIRECT User:Fran Rogers/CH2.js. In order for the script to work User:Krimpet/CH2.js needs to be replaced with User:Fran Rogers/CH2.js--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

F5 speedies
You currently need to be careful when tagging files for CSD#F5; because image moves/image redirects are now live on WMF, but are still a bit buggy. In particular, file links via a file redirect do not show up in the list of file links at the bottom of the image page. In the case of File:Hustle Series 5 Episode 2 extract.ogg, the file was in use on Hustle (TV series), just as the FUR stated, only it was being called via File:Hustle Series 5 Episode 2 extract.ogv. When you encounter a file like that, where there are no file links but there is an FUR, it's important to check the target article to confirm that the file really isn't in use.

Keep up the good work! Happy ‑ melon 13:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

FfD nominations of "unencyclopedic" images
Hello! Why are you continually nominating project images for deletion with only the rationale "unencyclopedic" (and no further explanation)? The images in question were never intended to be used in articles, a requirement only applicable to non-free media. —David Levy 15:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * There just screenshots of wikipedia with no encyclopedic use reusability.This is why we have photobucket or picasa to store screanshots.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 21:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Again, excepting non-free images, there is no requirement that images stored at Wikipedia have encyclopedic use. It's quite common to upload images for illustrative use within discussions/proposals, and I'm aware of no consensus that this is inappropriate.
 * What benefit do you believe would be obtained through these images' deletion? In case you didn't realize, this wouldn't remove them from our servers (so no hard disk space would be recovered).  —David Levy 01:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I did not know that tx for telling me.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)