User talk:InhaV

The article Oxagile has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oxagile


A tag has been placed on Oxagile, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tarheel95 (Sprechen) 15:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
I would recommend you to read WP:NPOV, our policy on neutral point of view. Your intention may not have been to promote, but your choice of wording said otherwise - and it's the wording that we have to go on. Please note that not every company gets an article. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, and not a directory or a site like AboutUs where anyone can put their information up. Please see WP:CORP for details of corporate notability, and WP:RS about the sort of references (reliable independent sources) that are needed to prove claims of notability. (The company site is not classed as a reliable source. nor are blogs, forums, press releases, AboutUs, PRWire, wikis and many others.) Peridon (talk) 17:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)