User talk:Inimageadvertising

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen (Inimageadvertising) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Calabe1992 17:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the In-image advertising article
Please stop the long-running revert war on this article. I have semi-protected the article itself, so that only registered users can edit it. However, this is not an endorsement of your preferred version of the article, and I have also encoraged the other participant in this to register an account in order to help resolve this dispute. Instead of merely reversing one another's changes, please discuss any changes to that page here, so that consensus can be achieved according to Wikipedia's editing rules. -- The Anome (talk) 18:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Picad did not create in-image ads
Picad Media did NOT create in-image advertising. That is absolute nonsense. GumGum introduced in-image ads to the market before Picad even launched as a company. In the interest of not going back and forth on the wikipedia page we've elected to, at least for the moment, just remove Picad's suggestion that they created in-image ads, not claim (accurately) that GumGum invented in-image advertising. The current page contains false and misleading information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inimageadvertising (talk • contribs) — Inimageadvertising (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

This account appears to be a role account editing to advertise or advocate the claims of a company called GumGum to have invented the concept of "in-image advertising" ("we've elected to, at least for the moment, just remove Picad's suggestion that they created in-image ads, not claim (accurately) that GumGum invented in-image advertising") and has been blocked as such. You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:26, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

The other user, "Inimagead", that has been editing this page IS Picad Media. Look at their username and comments. The claim that they invented in-image advertising is verifiably false. I appreciate your efforts, but they are now having the opposite intended effect.