User talk:Inniverse

This is my talk page and I do not wish to use it as a forum for public discussions as it has been so used in the past. For that reason I will not reply to messages in this forum. If you must post a necessary message, do not be insulted if I read and remove it. My removal of your post is my acknowledgment that it has been received. If I choose to reply, I will reply on your talk page (and it goes without saying that I will be watching or otherwise monitoring your talk page after I post a message). Inniverse (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * You'll have to explain to me why simultaneous editing proves anything at all. Are we to presume that you aren't capable of using two browser windows at once? That you cannot own a laptop and a desktop? That you never edit from an area where multiple computers are simultaneously available? Note that the problem here is not that you matched with Azviz, but that you matched with two other accounts.&mdash;Kww(talk) 22:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I confess full ignorance of your case, but I must ask how temporary block periods for deliberate sockpuppetry (I realize you are disputing this occurred, of course) are pursuant to policy. I am not aware of any particular policy that dictates sockmasters should necessarily be blocked temporarily rather than indefinitely. This may, however, be me overlooking something. - Vianello (Talk) 22:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Is it possible for a diff that shows that "It has previously been confirmed that (due to my editing location) a checkuser will always provide a “false positive” (i.e. “likely”) result when matched with Azviz, just as it would for any other editor who lives in the same million-plus population city as I do" (or would a CheckUser be required to confirm this?) - is there a very large rangeblock in place (please do not post details here of specific IPs for your own privacy)? Or does the whole city share the same small range of IPs? I live in an area with a population of about 1/3 million - and yet even a rangeblock with a fair range would not get most of us - in fact, I'd be surprised if it affected many people in the street in which I live! Could you please give us some more information to enable us to see that this has been confirmed --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a fair statement that Inniverse would always match Azviz at this point. Checkuser data against Azviz is old, and all we really have on Azviz himself is the geographic region, not a particular IP range. That's not the real issue, though: even given the vagueness of data on Azviz, the data on Moorsmur and Macpl is fresh. Here's our situation: Inniverse has always been a good behavioural match for Azviz, and, despite all the discussion on the original block, no one ever disputed that. He was unblocked after confirming his real-life identity to Georgewilliamherbert. Now, we catch him socking . We could block him as a sockmaster, or, since rampant socking is a part of Azviz's behavioural pattern, block him based on new confirmation of him behaviourally matching Azviz. I chose the latter.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Did Inniverse confirm past IP addresses to Georgewilliamherbert? That would help. Inniverse was asked, but refused to publicize them. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not privy to the exact contents. GWH has been asked to forward any information he might have to Arbcom in case this winds up there.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Pointing out that the unblock summary was a bit misleading: The process you went through with Georgewilliamherbert has not actually established that you are "not Avziz". Amalthea  20:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Transformers spacecraft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Transformers spacecraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Transformers spacecraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Claritas § 08:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Frilingos


The article George Frilingos has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to fail WP:GNG - bowler hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 02:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brandon Qualischefski


The article Brandon Qualischefski has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to fail WP:GNG - bowler hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 02:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of George Frilingos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Frilingos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Frilingos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hack (talk) 00:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Natalie Shelley


The article Natalie Shelley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable athlete. Hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hack (talk) 10:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Transformers spacecraft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Transformers spacecraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Transformers spacecraft& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Surface to Air (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surface to Air (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Surface to Air (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Film Creator (talk) 15:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)