User talk:Inra20

You have repeatedly changed the Miss_Venezuela to add the phrase "rumered to be" to the sentence: Venezuela, a highly multiracial and diverse country, is rumered to be the world's largest consumer of cosmetics on a per-capita basis, the culture of beauty runs deep as thousands of entrants apply for the pageant each year." It seems to me that this is statistic whose truth can be verified. Do you have proof (citations) that this is not the case? If not, I would appreciate it if phrases like "rumered [sic] to be" can be left out of articles, as wikipedia is not the place for speculation.

Denise Quinones
Please stop vandalizing this article. You have repeatedly places facts without any citations and your grammar. Please cite your sources or article will be reverted. --XLR8TION 01:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. XLR8TION 01:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC) (please stop)

Your IP Address has been reported for vandalism. Please be aware. Please cite your sources or article will be reverted. Wikipedia is not a forum for speculation or assumed popular belief.--XLR8TION 02:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been warned for the last time! Two editors have filed complaints. Next edit will most likely resulty in blocking. If you do not know how to write in English and don't understand html language please stay off this site. You obviously haven't read the site's guidelines on professional articles. --XLR8TION 04:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)--XLR8TION 04:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Denise Quinones
Last Warning! Your recent contribution(s) to did not provide specific references or sources. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable. Please provide specific references in your contributions to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content. You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article.

If you continue to add unsourced information to said article. It will be deemed as vandalism and you may be blocked. Tony the Marine 04:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on December 23 2006 to Denise Quiñones
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 05:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Shanna Moakler
Please stop vandalizing this page. You have been reported to an administrator and can be blocked. Please cite sources. If you can't leave the article alone and move on. --XLR8TION 22:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Dismas|(talk) 01:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding baseless claims to articles. You refuse to cooperate in providing citations and therefore that classifies you as rogue editor who has no consideration for structure or fact finding. I have repeatedly asked you to stop reverting the article. You will be reported once again.--XLR8TION 04:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Inra20, we know you are a sockpupper account of IP Address 70.126.2.82. Please be aware you have been reported to Wikipedia yet again. Stop your unconstructive edits and listen to reason. --XLR8TION 05:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing article. You have reverted the article way too many times. Please cite references as me and Dismas have asked you kindly to do. --XLR8TION 05:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)