User talk:Inside education

August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your changes to London School of Business and Finance, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Inside education", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website. Please note that Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or appear to be shared by multiple people. Please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 16:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Callanecc, thank you for your comment. I do not have a website nor am I promoting a particular brand. The name could equally be representative of an individual unless you have evidence to the contrary. I am simply uploading relevant content, to a wikipedia article as I have an interest in academic quality. I will also be making additions based on other QAA content. (Inside education (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2012 (UTC))


 * Thank you for replying and being interested in contributing to Wikipedia. All I did was Google "Inside education" and the first website which came up was http://www.insideeducation.ca/. Given that, I think that the username is a violation of the username policy. If nothing else while ever you have a username which may indicate that you have a conflict of interest your edits will be help to a much higher standard (whether it's 'right' or not, that's what happens). So it would probably be easier in the long-term to choser a different username, which is a pretty easy process (have a look at Changing username). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 16:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

I will certainly consider changing the name. Although I believe you will find that your search on Google led you to a website related to support for teachers and students "Our Mission We are a charitable education society providing programs that enable Canadian teachers and students to understand the science, technology and issues related to our environment and natural resources". Are you suggesting I am promoting this? Inside education is suitably vague to not be attributed to a particular organisation or to so many different organisations providing a wide variety of different sources that it would not be considered promotional. I am happy to be scrutinised after all it is evidence from the governing body for UK higher education. (Inside education (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC))


 * As an uninvolved editor, I concur with Callanecc that your username appears to be a problem. I would recommend changing the name.  Of course, you are free to disagree, in which case any concerned editor could take the issue to the COI Noticeboard.  It is just easier to avoid potential problems and change the name.  Regards,  GregJackP   Boomer!   02:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I would suggest as nothing contrary has appeared that goodwill is considered. Appreciating an industry experts contributions from sound academic resources is hardly worthy of the attention it is getting. (Inside education (talk) 00:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC))

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573619384 your edit] to London School of Business and Finance may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * by the government that they were charging fees and advertising an unregistered college.
 * were issued a fine of $64,000 for operating between April and May 2013 without license.