User talk:Insomniaingest

Welcome!

 * }

July 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page LGBT rights in Bahrain has been reverted. Your edit here to LGBT rights in Bahrain was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://gaymiddleeast.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello. Your recent edits seem to be motivated from a Persian-POV; you've been removing the word "Arab" from many articles, including articles which deal specifically with Arab affairs such as your move of Arab States of the Persian Gulf into States of the Persian Gulf. Please stop this behavior as it is very disruptive to the encyclopedia.  Mohamed CJ  (talk)  13:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not motivated from a Persian point of view, the article was initially named "Arab States of the Persian Gulf" which itself is biased and lacks neutrality in the naming dispute. In both local Khaleeji usage, terminology and international usage, those countries are generally referred to as simply "Gulf states" rather than the "Arab states of the Persian Gulf". I wanted to move the title's page to simply "Gulf states" but was unable to do so (don't know why). The states of the Persian Gulf article should be re-named "Gulf states" to avoid all bias and both POVs. The article's current title is "states of the Persian Gulf" - seemingly shorter than the initial title and leans less toward any specific viewpoint. Maybe "States in the Gulf" is better? Insomniaingest 14:15, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that I characterized you as editing from a POV, it was really not a good thing to begin with. We should not be considering the local usage, instead we follow the most common name in English language reliable sources (see WP:COMMON). A Google search for "Arab states of the Persian Gulf" returns about 5,030,000 results in contrast "Gulf states" returns about 5,510,000 results. This shows that both uses are very common. You weren't able to move the article, because a redirect already exists, and only Admins can move over a redirect. To properly request a move, especially for such controversial topics that are discussed over and over in talk pages, you should follow instruction here: WP:RM/CM, but I'd recommend reading WP:MOVE first.  Mohamed CJ  (talk)  15:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I would like to also note that I have no problem with the name Persian Gulf as you seem to have implied. The name is the most common in English language reliable sources and thus we use it.  Mohamed CJ  (talk)  15:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * This edit tells me you have a problem differentiating between Arab states of the Persian Gulf (without Iran) and States of the Persian Gulf (Iran included - this term is not often used if at all). You need to take all these discussions to talk pages, because they are controversial. And trust me, you will get in conflict with others and it's best to talk them out first.  Mohamed CJ   (talk)  15:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I changed it to "countries located in the Arabian coast bordering the Persian Gulf." Thanks for the "WP:" links on how to move over a redirect. Insomniaingest 15:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd like to reiterate what Mohamed has told you. I understand that there is a dispute over the name of the Gulf, and that this is a sensitive issue for some, but wikipedia uses WP:COMMONNAMES.  The Gulf is much more commonly referred to as the Persian Gulf than the Arab Gulf in English language usage.  This is why the article is located at the title Persian Gulf.  (Another example is the Republic of Macedonia, who's name is disputed.  We don't title the article "former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", even though this is the name that the country has been admitted under to most international organizations, because no one actually uses this name in common English usage to describe the country.)  Perhaps this isn't fair, as it takes one side of the dispute, but it's the reality of the situation.  If you think that Persian Gulf is not the common English name for the body of water, you should start a discussion at Talk:Persian Gulf.  But as it stands, daughter articles should follow the lead of the main article.  TDL (talk) 20:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Palestinian expulsion from Kuwait
Just so that you know, I've reverted your move of Palestinian expulsion from Kuwait because there is already a consensus for keeping the name, see the talk page. If you wish to rename the page, please start a new discussion. -- Mrmatiko (talk) 16:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Check the talk page. Insomniaingest 21:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Gulf War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Iraqi


 * History of Kuwait (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Iraqi


 * Palestinian refugee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Iraqi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kuwaiti women.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Kuwaiti women.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Jihadi John & Al Jahra
Hi there. Not sure why you keep removing his birthplace, supported by a perfectly reliable source. I take it that we can agree that ABC is reliable?

They have confirmed that he was born in Al Jahra. Well, technically they spoke to a couple of chaps who said he was born in Al Jahra ([A family acquaintance from Kuwait] and Abdul Hakeem al-Fadhli, an activist for stateless rights, said Emwazi lived in the run-down Taima area of Jahra, on the outskirts of Kuwait City), so I suppose if you really wanted to you could try to claim that they hadn't checked their facts. I doubt you'd get far with that line of argument though, as Al Jahra comes up a lot when talking about where the Emwazis lived when he was young.

Where we know the town of birth, it's included - c.f. David Cameron. Would you mind adding back the original? The 1RR means I can't do it myself. Bromley86 (talk) 23:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Ah, ignore me. Whilst English may be my first language, I'm clearly failing dismally in comprehension ATM.  I take it you won't have a problem with it being added back if I find a source that does actually say he was born there?  Bromley86 (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kuwait parliamentary election, 2013
Template:Kuwait parliamentary election, 2013 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 04:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Kuwait Vision 2035 moved to draftspace
Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuwait Vision 2035(2) (August 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kuwait Vision 2035(2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kuwait Vision 2035(2), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kuwait_Vision_2035(2) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kuwait_Vision_2035(2) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 13:25, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

COI check for Draft:Kuwait Vision 2035
Hello. Do you have any connection to Kuwait's government or public service? MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No. I do not have any connection to Kuwait's government or public service. Insomniaingest 15:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)